Protocol Online logo
Top : New Forum Archives (2009-): : PCR--RT-PCR-and-Real-Time-PCR
901. No gene amplification, 18s amplification is fine - (reply: 1)
902. RT-PCR stoped working!!! Same samples, same primers, same enzyme! - (reply: 3)
903. What can I do to increase the banding signal? - (reply: 6)
904. SYBR QPCR problem, please help! strange melting curve... - Primer dimers? Or other problems? (reply: 4)
905. Tomato Actin PCR+Images included - (reply: 2)
906. single primer PCR - (reply: 5)
907. Weird qPCR curves - (reply: 4)
908. Design strategy for real-time RT-PCR, how to decide on what gene of interest and - Newbie that's completly mRNA confused, please help! (reply: 2)
909. LacZ PCR Problems - (reply: 2)
910. Primer concentration - (reply: 4)
911. nested PCR with low target DNA? - (reply: 2)
912. RT-PCR calibrator - (reply: 2)
913. problem in pcr - (reply: 2)
914. Can someone recommend me a virtual PCR software? - (reply: 6)
915. negative values after GOI - reference gene ?? - (reply: 4)
916. RNA degradation during electrophoresis?? - (reply: 2)
917. Primer 3' mismatch - Strange experience (reply: 9)
918. wrong plot amplification in one-step RT- PCR - one step real time RT PCR (reply: 1)
919. Adding loading/tracking dye to PCR mix? - (reply: 10)
920. PCR: Band in one lane, streaking in the other..HELP! - (reply: 3)
921. internal control in RT-PCR - inquiry (reply: 2)
922. Melting Temp of Standards Changed? - (reply: 3)
923. DNA polymerase with single G 3'-end overhang activity - (reply: 3)
924. Primer BLAST and NetPrimer vs Primer3Plus - (reply: 3)
925. relative expression of genes using semiquantitative PCR - Semi-quantitative PCR (reply: 1)
926. genes having different annealing temperatures in the same qPCR run - housekeeping gene and target gene have different annealing temperature (reply: 1)
927. Gene on negative strand - two eductional questions. - (reply: 3)
928. Newbie- choose DNA template - (reply: 1)
929. Help -Water Blank keeps coming up with mutiple bands - (reply: 8)
930. Total RNA estimation - (reply: 2)