Protocol Online logo
Top : New Forum Archives (2009-): : PCR--RT-PCR-and-Real-Time-PCR
871. No gene amplification, 18s amplification is fine - (reply: 1)
872. RT-PCR stoped working!!! Same samples, same primers, same enzyme! - (reply: 3)
873. What can I do to increase the banding signal? - (reply: 6)
874. SYBR QPCR problem, please help! strange melting curve... - Primer dimers? Or other problems? (reply: 4)
875. Tomato Actin PCR+Images included - (reply: 2)
876. single primer PCR - (reply: 5)
877. Weird qPCR curves - (reply: 4)
878. Design strategy for real-time RT-PCR, how to decide on what gene of interest and - Newbie that's completly mRNA confused, please help! (reply: 2)
879. LacZ PCR Problems - (reply: 1)
880. Primer concentration - (reply: 4)
881. nested PCR with low target DNA? - (reply: 2)
882. RT-PCR calibrator - (reply: 2)
883. problem in pcr - (reply: 2)
884. Can someone recommend me a virtual PCR software? - (reply: 6)
885. negative values after GOI - reference gene ?? - (reply: 4)
886. RNA degradation during electrophoresis?? - (reply: 2)
887. Primer 3' mismatch - Strange experience (reply: 9)
888. wrong plot amplification in one-step RT- PCR - one step real time RT PCR (reply: 1)
889. Adding loading/tracking dye to PCR mix? - (reply: 10)
890. PCR: Band in one lane, streaking in the other..HELP! - (reply: 3)
891. internal control in RT-PCR - inquiry (reply: 2)
892. Melting Temp of Standards Changed? - (reply: 3)
893. DNA polymerase with single G 3'-end overhang activity - (reply: 3)
894. Primer BLAST and NetPrimer vs Primer3Plus - (reply: 3)
895. relative expression of genes using semiquantitative PCR - Semi-quantitative PCR (reply: 1)
896. genes having different annealing temperatures in the same qPCR run - housekeeping gene and target gene have different annealing temperature (reply: 1)
897. Gene on negative strand - two eductional questions. - (reply: 3)
898. Newbie- choose DNA template - (reply: 1)
899. Help -Water Blank keeps coming up with mutiple bands - (reply: 8)
900. Total RNA estimation - (reply: 2)