Protocol Online logo
Top : New Forum Archives (2009-): : Indexed by Topic
Dimer Related Discussions
  1. MSP_Primer dimers? - (reply: 1)
  2. oligomerisation without dimer - (reply: 1)
  3. Possible primer dimer problem..Need solution!!! - (reply: 2)
  4. Any online tool to check the propability of primer dimer formetion _ - (reply: 4)
  5. Primers have worked well but now getting primer dimers? - (reply: 2)
  6. Native gel electrophoresis: Can it tell if a protein is forming dimer? - (reply: 1)
  7. Tool / software for oligo analysis (hairpins, dimers etc.)? - (reply: 5)
  8. high MW dimers - (reply: 2)
  9. Primer dimers - (reply: 2)
  10. Another primer dimers problem - (reply: 23)
  11. SYBR QPCR problem, please help! strange melting curve... - Primer dimers? Or other problems? (reply: 4)
  12. When are primer dimers a problem? - (reply: 1)
  13. Primer dimer formation and real-time PCR - (reply: 7)
  14. Is it possible to see a dimer/oligomer in denaturing SDS-PAGE? - (reply: 1)
  15. Primers and self and hetero dimers - (reply: 1)
  16. designing MSP primers (dimers NOOOOOOOO!) - (reply: 1)
  17. PCR product dimer issue - (reply: 24)
  18. PCR troubleshoooooting - primer dimer (reply: 1)
  19. Dimer or monomer - (reply: 11)
  20. Confusing bands from PCR - not primer dimer, not product (reply: 30)
  21. Suggestions for primer design - How many bonds is "too many" to avoid dimers and hairpins? (reply: 2)
  22. Designing Primers for RT-PCR after ChIP - Help to avoid primer dimers (reply: 2)
  23. Primer Dimer in NTC Only? - Primers Dimers show up in NTC but not template wells (reply: 4)
  24. primer dimer - (reply: 2)
  25. want to purify PCR product from agarose gel but have primer dimer - (reply: 3)
  26. light bands, dark smear, dark dimers - (reply: 2)
  27. primer dimer or what? - (reply: 2)
  28. Primer dimer issue in real time PCR - (reply: 21)
  29. RT-PCR primer dimers and cDNA degradation - (reply: 2)
  30. Making Primer Dimers on Purpose - odd I know...but humor me (reply: 5)
  31. primer dimers - (reply: 5)