Protocol Online logo
Top : Forum Archives: : Protein and Proteomics

Why 150 mM KCL in homogenization buffer - (Oct/10/2008 )

Hi.

I see some journals use hight K+ in homogenization buffer (150 mM kcl), not the commonly used NaCl. I am wondering why. thanks

-jamestong-

QUOTE (jamestong @ Oct 10 2008, 02:50 PM)
Hi.

I see some journals use hight K+ in homogenization buffer (150 mM kcl), not the commonly used NaCl. I am wondering why. thanks


in this case, K+ seems to have a more effectory potency on your proteins of interest than Na+; losing K+ during homogeneization by high Na+ may alter the structure of some of these proteins...

-The Bearer-

QUOTE (The Bearer @ Oct 12 2008, 07:45 AM)
QUOTE (jamestong @ Oct 10 2008, 02:50 PM)
Hi.

I see some journals use hight K+ in homogenization buffer (150 mM kcl), not the commonly used NaCl. I am wondering why. thanks


in this case, K+ seems to have a more effectory potency on your proteins of interest than Na+; losing K+ during homogeneization by high Na+ may alter the structure of some of these proteins...


Do you mean in high K+, the protein is more soluble?

-jamestong-

QUOTE (jamestong @ Oct 12 2008, 09:47 AM)
QUOTE (The Bearer @ Oct 12 2008, 07:45 AM)
QUOTE (jamestong @ Oct 10 2008, 02:50 PM)
Hi.

I see some journals use hight K+ in homogenization buffer (150 mM kcl), not the commonly used NaCl. I am wondering why. thanks


in this case, K+ seems to have a more effectory potency on your proteins of interest than Na+; losing K+ during homogeneization by high Na+ may alter the structure of some of these proteins...


Do you mean in high K+, the protein is more soluble?


in more acurate, functional conformation...

-The Bearer-

QUOTE (The Bearer @ Oct 13 2008, 04:52 AM)
QUOTE (jamestong @ Oct 12 2008, 09:47 AM)
QUOTE (The Bearer @ Oct 12 2008, 07:45 AM)
QUOTE (jamestong @ Oct 10 2008, 02:50 PM)
Hi.

I see some journals use hight K+ in homogenization buffer (150 mM kcl), not the commonly used NaCl. I am wondering why. thanks


in this case, K+ seems to have a more effectory potency on your proteins of interest than Na+; losing K+ during homogeneization by high Na+ may alter the structure of some of these proteins...


Do you mean in high K+, the protein is more soluble?


in more acurate, functional conformation...


Thanks

-jamestong-

QUOTE (The Bearer @ Oct 13 2008, 01:52 AM)
in more acurate, functional conformation...


hm...thanks...so I think I'm gonna replace NaCl with KCl in my buffers too, if as you say K+ really saves conformation better. because I'm working on Bax which its conformation changes during apoptosis.

-Curtis-

QUOTE (Curtis @ Oct 18 2008, 08:59 AM)
QUOTE (The Bearer @ Oct 13 2008, 01:52 AM)
in more acurate, functional conformation...


hm...thanks...so I think I'm gonna replace NaCl with KCl in my buffers too, if as you say K+ really saves conformation better. because I'm working on Bax which its conformation changes during apoptosis.


to avoid a misunderstanding: high K+ during preparation seems to be relevant for some but not all proteins; if there are no concrete recommendations for a buffer, try a buffer with Na+ in excess over K+

-The Bearer-

another reason to use kcl instead of nacl is if you are using phosphate buffers in relatively high concentration and at low temperatures. naphos is less soluble at low temperatures than kphos and will crystallize.

also

in ion exchange chromatography, kcl is stronger than nacl.

-mdfenko-