Protocol Online logo
Top : Forum Archives: : Evolution and Darwinism

Chemtrails in the skies - The chemtrail controversy (Nov/20/2007 )

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

This is a survey. Have you looked up in the sky on a weekend and wondered how there could be so many exhaust plumes from jets traveling over you house. What do you think chemtrails are? Look at the attachment. Are they from aluminum powder used to reduce the effect of global warming or do they contain chemicals and pathogens used to reduce you and yours from the earth?

1. Weather modification
2. Solar screen
3. Biological inoculation
4. Population reduction

I personally believe # 2 & 3 are correct. What are your thoughts????? unsure.gif

-dave2-

QUOTE (dave2 @ Nov 20 2007, 01:45 PM)
This is a survey. Have you looked up in the sky on a weekend and wondered how there could be so many exhaust plumes from jets traveling over you house. What do you think chemtrails are? Look at the attachment. Are they from aluminum powder used to reduce the effect of global warming or do they contain chemicals and pathogens used to reduce you and yours from the earth?

1. Weather modification
2. Solar screen
3. Biological inoculation
4. Population reduction

I personally believe # 2 & 3 are correct. What are your thoughts????? unsure.gif


Hi dave,

I like conspiracy theories like everybody else but these chemtrails are a bit of a stretch. If I were really to spray the sky with something for whatever reason, why do it in broad daylight where everybody can enjoy and record the show… whatever happened to the "cover of darkness"… unless… I'm using the ingenious strategy of "hiding in plain sight" …oh, these evil people from south of the border (we're sharing the same sky) wacko.gif .

Also wouldn't they (the culprits) and theirs be as much affected by the chemical fallout as everyone else considering that the winds have a mind of their own? And if it's to fix global warning, imagine the millions wasted just to fuel up these jets when there are cheaper and more effective ways to save the environment like banning those gas-guzzling SUVs and using less hairspray.

And finally, why did you put this thread here in the evolution forum? Because of the possible effects of the chemicals on us and ours and then on ours' future ours? Yeah, I like how your mind works!!!

cheers,

casandra

-casandra-

He he. Do any of you occationally lisen to the Art Bell's show after midnight? People are making money on making up these stories.

-genehunter-1-

QUOTE (dave2 @ Nov 20 2007, 03:45 PM)
This is a survey. Have you looked up in the sky on a weekend and wondered how there could be so many exhaust plumes from jets traveling over you house. What do you think chemtrails are? Look at the attachment. Are they from aluminum powder used to reduce the effect of global warming or do they contain chemicals and pathogens used to reduce you and yours from the earth?

1. Weather modification
2. Solar screen
3. Biological inoculation
4. Population reduction

I personally believe # 2 & 3 are correct. What are your thoughts????? unsure.gif

i believe that the "chemtrails" are more properly called "contrails" ("con" being short for "condensation") and are just water.

they are a product of fuel combustion. you see a similar effect on cool days when you first start your car. the white smoke is water that results from the combustion of gasoline in your engine (if it is anything other than white, see your mechanic because there is more going on in your engine than there is supposed to be).

attributing the contrails to anything else is pure conspiracy theory.

and, yes, i do look up in the sky and watch the contrails.

-mdfenko-

ALL I CAN SAY IS THAT YOU EASILY FOOLED LIVESTOCK LOVE TO BELIEVE THAT YOUR GOVERNMENTS ARE TAKING CARE OF YOU AS MUCH AS FAITH WORSHIPPERS BELIEVE IN THEIR RELIGION!!!!
7 years ago I Spoke to Dr. Kelly, actor Steve Mcqueen's doctor, and asked why there wasn't a missing link to Chlamydia Pneumoniae bacteria, just one of three man made pathogens you have inside of your body. He told me that it was made in test tubes and dropped on us during the night at 60,000 feet. There aren't any records of these planes from the FAA because they're clasified as class A (60,000 feet). That's why most of us have these pathogen in our bodies that will eventually kill us - - they cause some type of auto antibody reactions to occur when the immune system can no longer keep these pathogens in check. Just have an IGG antibody test done and see what the titers are. 80% of the population test positive for antinuclear antibodies as opposed to 30%, 30 years ago. Where do you think you got them? This means that your very close to developing an immune disease caused from some type of pathogen. THE DISCOVERY OF THE CENTURY WAS THAT MOST DISEASES AREN'T FROM A GENETIC DEFECT, BUT CAUSED FROM ONE OR MORE COMMON INTRACELLULAR PATHOGENS!!!! Do you know just how many sociopaths there are incharge of your government???? Perhaps they're tired of so many stupid people around.
DID YOU KNOW THAT MOST OF THE REAL GOOD SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS THAT I'VE SPOKEN TO BELIEVE ALL OF THIS AND MORE.

-dave2-

i was thinking your ranting is more akin to R#@*?/>N (wont use the R-word, not safe).
please tell me you dont work with anything too toxic for all our sakes

btw - does treating steve mcqueen make him a better doctor?

and whats your definition of a "REAL GOOD SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHER" - is it perhaps one who listens to you (skewed results)

-Dominic-

I am just curious what scale of the facility would someone need to have to produce enough of it to spread the whole world, assuming each pathogen has 10e-6 of chance of falling onto and infect one of us?

-genehunter-1-

QUOTE (Dominic @ Nov 21 2007, 08:35 AM)
i was thinking your ranting is more akin to R#@*?/>N (wont use the R-word, not safe).
please tell me you dont work with anything too toxic for all our sakes

btw - does treating steve mcqueen make him a better doctor?

and whats your definition of a "REAL GOOD SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHER" - is it perhaps one who listens to you (skewed results)


PLEASE NO MOCKERY ON THIS SITE!!!! Your showing just how young and niave you are. Dr. kelly cured Steve, but the goverrnment killed him. A good researcher is one who has been medically trained like myself and has 20 plus years experience doing laboratory work with diseases. Sorry but you don't qualify. And perhaps someone who doesn't hate foreigners????

-dave2-

QUOTE (genehunter-1 @ Nov 21 2007, 08:38 AM)
I am just curious what scale of the facility would someone need to have to produce enough of it to spread the whole world, assuming each pathogen has 10e-6 of chance of falling onto and infect one of us?


Governments are big and have vast resources. They probably live for 12 hours. Get me a sample and I'll test it! biggrin.gif

-dave2-

QUOTE (dave2 @ Nov 21 2007, 12:03 PM)
PLEASE NO MOCKERY ON THIS SITE!!!! Your showing just how young and niave you are. Dr. kelly cured Steve, but the goverrnment killed him. A good researcher is one who has been medically trained like myself and has 20 plus years experience doing laboratory work with diseases. Sorry but you don't qualify. And perhaps someone who doesn't hate foreigners????

you say "no mockery on this site" yet you refer to us as "easily fooled livestock"?

i guess if we disagree then we are mocking you but you are not mocking us.

i know that the various governments of this world have performed illegal experiments on their citizens (it's been in all the newspapers), but you have to look at the scale of what you are proposing. even the government would have difficulty maintaining secrecy on such a project for the amount of time that they would have had to have been doing it based on the degree of infection that you claim.

as for steve mcqueen, cured? he died of a heart attack after unconventional treatment for metastatic mesothelioma in mexico. nobody cured him.

any one can represent themself as someone or something that they are not. i would check credentials before i would believe something like what your doctor kelly says.

i may sound cynical but i think it is more educated than cynical. also, most scientists don't take things at face value but would rather find the truth.

-mdfenko-

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next