When you say you usually measure 1ml- is that in a cuvette in a spectro? If yes, then you aren't actually measuring the whole 1ml are you? Just the absorbance of light that passes through that small bit of the cuvette in the middle somewhere. Volume is irrelevant- its all about path length.
My guess is that the micro plate reader has been set up in such a way as to calculate the OD600 accurately for a 200ul volume. So when you add a different volume, you stuff the readings up. Again, as for spectro the volume is almost irrelevant- the 200ul is used so that the path length is known, and that is all.
So adding 100ul, or 300ul and you change the path length, making your readings useless.
(If I am understanding what you are doing correctly)
- BioForum
- > Viewing Profile: leelee
Community Stats
- Group Active Members
- Active Posts 418 (0.36 per day)
- Most Active In Tissue and Cell Culture (66 posts)
- Profile Views 9,915
- Member Title Veteran
- Age Age Unknown
- Birthday Birthday Unknown
-
Gender
Not Telling
-
Location
Australia
14
Good
User Tools
Latest Visitors
Posts I've Made
In Topic: Question about measuring bacterial OD
16 May 2012 - 12:51 AM
In Topic: Blood tube for WBC analysis
15 May 2012 - 05:22 AM
You can lyse them using a red blood cell lysis buffer? That is pretty common practice. You should be able to find a protocol and recipe fairly easy by asking Professor Google
In Topic: Help to optain a long PCR produc
11 May 2012 - 04:52 PM
What are your reaction conditions?
In Topic: 7500 Reaction Volume
10 May 2012 - 08:49 AM
I don't think you can. I thought that the volume was used to help determine the ramping times for each temp cycle of the reaction. So I think its too late, and the run would have been optimised for whatever volume you entered.
Whether this is a major problem or not I'm not sure. What was your volume and what did you set it at?
As for normalising your data, sorry I'm absolutely no help to you there...sorry. Hope someone else has some ideas!
(maybe comparing your standards to another run?)
Whether this is a major problem or not I'm not sure. What was your volume and what did you set it at?
As for normalising your data, sorry I'm absolutely no help to you there...sorry. Hope someone else has some ideas!
(maybe comparing your standards to another run?)
In Topic: I'm desperately seeking for the program that I used to generate this alignm
10 May 2012 - 08:44 AM
I think it is CLC
You could always download the trial version to check if I'm right?
http://www.clcbio.com/index.php?id=16
You could always download the trial version to check if I'm right?
http://www.clcbio.com/index.php?id=16
- BioForum
- > Viewing Profile: leelee





Find content
Display name history
