It depends on why your success rate is what it is. i suppose there are two reasons why an experiment goes sour. (i) error in execution and (ii) error in design.any experiments require careful planning. having stated the obvious, i do all my thinking/planning before the experiments, write down exact game of plan before you actually execute. once i am doing the experiments, i just follow my protocol exactly. i always tell my students to think about the experiments. what i mean is that i picture myself doing each steps of the protocol the night before. however, i have to admit that sometimes i found myself doing something terribly wrong. then i guess you have to think on your feet to figure out the problem. to develop skills to think on your feet, it is important to know why you are doing each steps. when you know why you are doing what you are doing, it is easier to fix your mistakes. if it is an experimental flaw, then you are doomed to begin with. it doesnt matter how well you have executed your experiments, if you are missing controls, or going after leads that are false, what is the point?
There is a learning curve to this, and it is a steep one. It's sometimes too pricy to learn by trial and error, but your perseverance will one day translate to good science.
i dont usually believe in god, but if you are up there, please save me superman! --homer simpson
my best,
jeff kwak
- BioForum
- → Viewing Profile: Likes: Trof
Community Stats
- Group Global Moderators
- Active Posts 950
- Profile Views 13,750
- Member Title Brain on a stick
- Age 31 years old
- Birthday June 14, 1982
-
Gender
Female
-
Location
Czech Republic
-
Hobbies
Gliding, computers, webdesign
About me
-
Lab or Group
Dept. of Biology
-
Institution
Palacky University Olomouc
-
My research interests
Molecular hematology, real-time PCR
#151373 How to increase the overall success rate of experiments
Posted
jeff kwak
on 01 March 2013 - 03:28 PM
#147855 unexpected band in PCR with plasmid
Posted
doxorubicin
on 11 January 2013 - 05:06 AM
The secret to finding your reverse primer in your sequence: http://www.bioinform...s/rev_comp.html
#131782 cdna synthesis
Posted
Curtis
on 27 March 2012 - 01:52 AM
You should normalize your RNA according to grams (weight), not according to the volume.
We usually take 100 ng - 1 ug of RNA before synthesizing cDNA. Then we normally take 1- 2 ul of the cDNA reaction for our qPCR reaction, without measuring cDNA concentration. It works fine for us. It is difficult to measure cDNA concentration since it has RT enzyme, dNTP and buffer contamination. It's up to you however to measure it or not. you can also purify your cDNA before qPCR, but you will lose a lot of cDNA. If you want to measure cDNA concentration remember to adjust your spectrophotometer (for example Nnopdrop) to ssDNA.
If the template RNA is total RNA from cells make sure you use DNase to remove genomic DNA, because although you are using RNA extraction kits, it might still contain genomic DNA that might cause prroblem during qPCR as your primers might bind to gDNA and give wrong signal.
We usually take 100 ng - 1 ug of RNA before synthesizing cDNA. Then we normally take 1- 2 ul of the cDNA reaction for our qPCR reaction, without measuring cDNA concentration. It works fine for us. It is difficult to measure cDNA concentration since it has RT enzyme, dNTP and buffer contamination. It's up to you however to measure it or not. you can also purify your cDNA before qPCR, but you will lose a lot of cDNA. If you want to measure cDNA concentration remember to adjust your spectrophotometer (for example Nnopdrop) to ssDNA.
If the template RNA is total RNA from cells make sure you use DNase to remove genomic DNA, because although you are using RNA extraction kits, it might still contain genomic DNA that might cause prroblem during qPCR as your primers might bind to gDNA and give wrong signal.
#127307 Gradient PCR
Posted
Ameya P
on 18 January 2012 - 11:30 PM
Home work?
BTW, welcome to Bioforum and the wikipedia black out is over.
BTW, welcome to Bioforum and the wikipedia black out is over.
#124464 Important literature for real time PCR users
Posted
Liinda
on 29 November 2011 - 04:56 AM
As tea-test has been so great in giving us so much useful information, I thought I would also add a link that was about RNA cleanup but on the Microarray forum and given by Huni. It's not quite about qPCR but related as it is about prep of RNA for applications like qPCR and I (as a newbie to qPCR) thought was very good.
Here is the article:
Krebs et al cleanup of TRIzol from RNA.pdf 217.88K
513 downloads
huni, on 04 January 2010 - 08:53 PM, said:
Do you guys know this paper published in 2009 titled as 'A simple and loss-free method to remove TRIzol contaminations from minute RNA samples'?
At least I observed that the RNA purity increased a lot after purification following this simple and cheap protocol.
Link is below;
http://www.sciencedi...5f0ccbcb7e882e4
At least I observed that the RNA purity increased a lot after purification following this simple and cheap protocol.
Link is below;
http://www.sciencedi...5f0ccbcb7e882e4
Here is the article:
Krebs et al cleanup of TRIzol from RNA.pdf 217.88K
513 downloads
#115227 Best plasmid miniprep?
Posted
sciencelover
on 16 July 2011 - 09:52 AM
I have been using a new kit from Zymo called the [url="[url]http://www.alkaliscientific.com/en/zyppy-plasmid-miniprep/515-zyppy-plasmid-miniprep-kit.html"]Zyppy[/url] Miniprep kit[/url]. Its way faster than standard minprep kits because it bypasses the conventional pelleting and resuspension steps. It has really high yields too.. way better than Qiagen. I buy it through Alkali Scientific because they have a good price on it and free shipping.
- BioForum
- → Viewing Profile: Likes: Trof
- Privacy Policy





Find content

