Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

k_undertoe

Member Since 26 Jan 2009
Offline Last Active Nov 21 2012 08:30 AM
-----

Posts I've Made

In Topic: I need to break this cycle of PCR issues

21 November 2012 - 08:11 AM

Previous users gave good tips, are you adhering to all the 'rules' for a good PCR? e.g don't freeze-thaw aliquots of primers, dNTPs, DNA template etc. multiple times?  Also, using different primer concentration aliquots (for ex. I aliquot 10micromolar, 20 and 50, and sometimes the 10's will go off) can sometimes affect the reaction.  If you store in TE, that can affect downstream efficiency- do you always add the same amount of starting template to your reactions, or do you 'dilute' out?  The presence of inhibitors from that source may contribute if so.

In Topic: Strange RT to qPCR results with new kit

21 November 2012 - 07:45 AM

View Postk_undertoe, on 15 November 2012 - 01:39 PM, said:

I recently began using a different product to produce cDNA.  It is a commercial kit with a 2-step protocol, the first using a gDNA elimination step and then proceeds with an RTase from a 'new source' and also a non-specified primer mix, which is said to be good for low abundance transcripts as well as transcript from 5' ends.

SO, I have used the kit and the first time I did not generate ANY amplifiable signal even for my reference genes (GAPDH, RPS19).  I did a side-by-side prep of control fibroblast cDNA using my previous kit, so it was not an issue of bad sample.  Tech support could not come up with any reason it did not work so they sent me a new kit.  I again ran through the protocol, but this time I got signal from everything.  Genes that the fibroblasts do not express came up as positive (Oct4!).  All of my controls are clean- the RT minus control for the fibroblasts shows no amplification, my no-template water only controls come back clear too.  I did no-template controls for both my RT step AND my qPCR step so there is definitely no contamination in the mastermix.

I have no idea where this signal is coming from, considering my RT minus control is clean as well as my no template controls.  Any ideas?

The new kit that does not work is the QuantiTect RT kit from Qiagen, and the one we have been using that works is the Cells-to-cDNA II kit by Ambion (distrib. by Invitrogen).

In Topic: Strange RT to qPCR results with new kit

21 November 2012 - 07:41 AM

View Postbob1, on 16 November 2012 - 11:32 PM, said:

Sounds like genomic DNA contamination.  The first run through sounds like you didn't get rid of the DNase effectively before cDNA prep or used too much RNase, which can act non-specifically on DNA sometimes.

It can't be genomic contamination because my RT minus control for the cells  came up clean.  If there was genomic contamination, that control would have had genomic DNA left in it that would have been amplified.  My first run... possibly I would say DNase could have totally annihilated my sample, I can see that may have been the issue; we don't treat with RNase so that is not it.

In Topic: virus transduction vs plasmid transfection

18 June 2012 - 01:21 PM

When you use a virus, the packaged virus has associated factors that allow it to be integrated and transcribed if it is a lentivirus/retrovirus.  Are you using an adenovirus? A sendai virus?  Depending on what your virus is, it can integrate stably or multiple times into the host genome to give expression at different levels.  The method of transfection/transduction is also dosage sensitive, giving a larger or smaller number of plasmid copies delivered into each cell.

In Topic: sequence alignment

18 June 2012 - 01:18 PM

What species?  If you already have sequences, such as a shotgun genome sequence and an EST mRNA sequence then go for it, but if you are LOOKING for a rare or non-popular species (platypus)I would try ENSEMBL.  They cross-link and reference with NCBI BLAST.  Also try the ENA.  If you are looking for purely alignment, you might try sequencher as a demo.  Primer design is another story.  Try NCBI both for the design tool and also as a reference for other people that have already tested primers for your sequence and species.

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2012 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.