The answer you are looking for can't even begin to be estimated, so you have to make some assumptions.
And I did, the assumptions are as follows: Vertebrates that hatched or otherwise entered into the world.
hobglobin, on 02 February 2013 - 05:04 AM, said:
Yes it mainly depends on species, but a general trend may be that generalist species with no special needs in terms of habitat, diet, climate etc (also called ubiquitous, euryoecious or eurytopic, considering the different factors) have stable populations or increase even (examples are rats, mice, raccoons, sparrows, pigeons etc), whereas specialist species with quite narrow niches and specialist needs concerning the mentioned factors have often declining populations (stenotopic, stenoecious species).
The divider here is when an animal would feel pain because of dying so to make that part a bit easier even if it is not the absolute truth: eggs being eaten would not be considered a death but anything hatched or otherwise alive when arriving into the outside world and dying seconds later would be considered a death.
Populations are stable even with our human influence?