- BioForum
- → Viewing Profile: Likes: Pangea
Community Stats
- Group Active Members
- Active Posts 95
- Profile Views 513
- Member Title Enthusiast
- Age Age Unknown
- Birthday Birthday Unknown
-
Gender
Male
About me
-
My research interests
Science
Contact Information
#148235 what is the contamination in buffers
Posted
leelee
on 17 January 2013 - 03:52 AM
#148066 No activity of expressed protein obtained from pET32a cloned gene
Posted
hRNA
on 14 January 2013 - 10:59 PM
#148055 pEGFP C-1/N-1 Cloning
Posted
Curtis
on 14 January 2013 - 06:58 PM
#148024 Wet transfer of proteins between 100-200kDa
Posted
bob1
on 14 January 2013 - 12:05 PM
#147984 pET 32 (+)
Posted
phage434
on 13 January 2013 - 01:50 PM
#147824 Delivery to cytosol of cultured cells
Posted
Jon Moulton
on 10 January 2013 - 10:39 AM
Mellert K, Lamla M, Scheffzek K, Wittig R, Kaufmann D. Enhancing endosomal escape of transduced proteins by photochemical internalisation. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052473. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
http://www.plosone.o...al.pone.0052473
#147891 pEGFP C-1/N-1 Cloning
Posted
Curtis
on 12 January 2013 - 05:05 AM
#147707 Dam Dcm Negative Strain
Posted
bob1
on 08 January 2013 - 06:27 PM
#147923 TAP Water
Posted
Tabaluga
on 12 January 2013 - 02:04 PM
http://en.wikipedia...._water_analysis
http://www.epa.state...rt/microman.pdf
#147798 Large-Scale Purification of Non-Secreted Protein in E.Coli or CHO Cells
Posted
leelee
on 09 January 2013 - 09:36 PM
Curtis, on 09 January 2013 - 08:24 PM, said:
Actually, both are acceptable. Usually one would use lower case, but litre is the exception, where upper case can be used when concerned about mixing up a 1 and an l. And also, most countries spell it "litre". I'm pretty sure it's is just the Americans who use "liter".
(source: Internationional bureau for weights and measurements http://www.bipm.org/...apter5/5-1.html)
#147795 Large-Scale Purification of Non-Secreted Protein in E.Coli or CHO Cells
Posted
Curtis
on 09 January 2013 - 08:24 PM
Of course there are other methods, some people prefer to not use detergent, and instead break cells physically. there are machines for that. But in the lab most people use lysis buffers, because they are cheap. RIPA is really strong, and honestly it is not my favorite either. I used CHAPS buffer for some time, and then for my fractionation studies I used digitonin buffer. You can study different types of detergents at Wikipedia. I'd recommend you to study them carefully, it's important to know their differences.
1000 L is very large volume though, it's like 1 ton. it's a pilot scale. Even if you use lysis buffer you need to centrifuge that 1000 L to get a clear supernatant. that would need a huge centrifuge. I would also think for an alternative if I were you. I will check this and let you know because I have never lysed this many cells.
#147719 Insulin production
Posted
Curtis
on 08 January 2013 - 09:12 PM
http://www.abpischoo...tion_allTopic=1
If you need more in-depth material you need to check the Diabetes Journal under American Diabetes Association.
#147644 Replication of the Plasmid DNA
Posted
bob1
on 07 January 2013 - 02:37 PM
#147661 Restriction Enzymes
Posted
pito
on 08 January 2013 - 02:00 AM
Pangea, on 08 January 2013 - 01:56 AM, said:
sure.
Its possible but not practical
You simply need the DNA sequence of the restriction enzym with the promoter etc... there is no reason that it would not work, but if you have to collect the enzyme/purify it etc.. it will take a lot of time, money ...
BTW: check this topic http://www.protocol-...ing-polymerase/
its not about a RE , but the same goes for you. Altough, your would be harder to collect/purify
#147559 How to transform adherent cells to suspension (CHO cells)
Posted
Denny
on 06 January 2013 - 10:07 AM
SFM... about adaption methods as well.
- BioForum
- → Viewing Profile: Likes: Pangea
- Privacy Policy





Find content

