Hi I am trouble shooting for the standard curves and would appreciate any input. I am using supermix (Biorad) in iCycler iQ (Biorad) machine. When I used the same primer/template/setting around one year ago, the PCR efficiency of the standard curve is around 100%. However, when I used the same reagents this month, PCR efficiency is usually around 65-75%. I have tested the following: 1) different batches of supermix from my lab and other labs, 2) re-maxiprep plasmid template, 3) tested primers from different batch but none of them had any effect. The weird thing is when cDNA dilutions were used to establish the standard curve, the PCR efficiency is close to 100%. Due to the nature of absolute quantification, I have to use plasmid as the template. I am wondering if you have any suggestions on how to improve PCR efficiency. Thanks in advance!
Low qPCR efficiency with plasmid template, why?
Started by aphroditeH, Aug 19 2009 04:19 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 19 August 2009 - 04:19 PM
#2
Posted 04 September 2009 - 02:40 PM
aphroditeH, on Aug 19 2009, 05:19 PM, said:
Hi I am trouble shooting for the standard curves and would appreciate any input. I am using supermix (Biorad) in iCycler iQ (Biorad) machine. When I used the same primer/template/setting around one year ago, the PCR efficiency of the standard curve is around 100%. However, when I used the same reagents this month, PCR efficiency is usually around 65-75%. I have tested the following: 1) different batches of supermix from my lab and other labs, 2) re-maxiprep plasmid template, 3) tested primers from different batch but none of them had any effect. The weird thing is when cDNA dilutions were used to establish the standard curve, the PCR efficiency is close to 100%. Due to the nature of absolute quantification, I have to use plasmid as the template. I am wondering if you have any suggestions on how to improve PCR efficiency. Thanks in advance!
Seems something in the template for making standard curve inhibit the pcr amplification, that is why when you diluted, the efficiency is OK. I would suggest prepare a new batch plasmid, make sure free of RNA, protein and endotoxin. Good luck.
#3
Posted 08 September 2009 - 09:39 AM
Are you linearising your plasmid? I wasn't sure from what you wrote - I have read that not doing this can affect the efficiency
#4
Posted 08 September 2009 - 11:31 AM
frankfan, on Sep 4 2009, 03:40 PM, said:
aphroditeH, on Aug 19 2009, 05:19 PM, said:
Hi I am trouble shooting for the standard curves and would appreciate any input. I am using supermix (Biorad) in iCycler iQ (Biorad) machine. When I used the same primer/template/setting around one year ago, the PCR efficiency of the standard curve is around 100%. However, when I used the same reagents this month, PCR efficiency is usually around 65-75%. I have tested the following: 1) different batches of supermix from my lab and other labs, 2) re-maxiprep plasmid template, 3) tested primers from different batch but none of them had any effect. The weird thing is when cDNA dilutions were used to establish the standard curve, the PCR efficiency is close to 100%. Due to the nature of absolute quantification, I have to use plasmid as the template. I am wondering if you have any suggestions on how to improve PCR efficiency. Thanks in advance!
Seems something in the template for making standard curve inhibit the pcr amplification, that is why when you diluted, the efficiency is OK. I would suggest prepare a new batch plasmid, make sure free of RNA, protein and endotoxin. Good luck.
Thanks for the reply. I do suspect that's the case. However, dilutions of plasmid template still have low pcr efficiency, even though dilutions of cDNA work perfectly. I did try to prepare a new batch plasmid but no difference.
#6
Posted 09 September 2009 - 01:41 PM
aphroditeH, on Sep 8 2009, 12:33 PM, said:
I tested linearlized plasmids versus uncut ones but there is no difference.
Any other ideas why the pcr amplifies at high efficiency (>90%) when dilutions of cDNA was used as the template but at low efficiency (70%) when plasmids were used. Thanks!













