Storage of invitrogen top10 cells
#1
Posted 23 June 2009 - 06:44 AM
i did a bad mistake 2 months back and i found that today.
Till now i stored the invitrogen top10 cells at -20 instead of -80. Yesterday i was trying to grow from stock and after 16 hours at 20 degree, the od is 0.035.
do you think the cells are bad and i have to throw all the cells away. or i can give more time and see whats happening.
Any suggestion will be appreaciated.
#2
Posted 23 June 2009 - 04:37 PM
#3
Posted 23 June 2009 - 05:09 PM
Try growing at 37 C with strong agitation
Edited by hanming86, 23 June 2009 - 05:09 PM.
#4
Posted 26 June 2009 - 12:35 PM
our -80 broke down 2 weeks ago and I had to put my chemically TOP10 competent cells in -20 freezer for a week before transferring to a new -80. I checked my cells yesterday after transformation and they work fine and I have many colonies on agar plate.
I save my cells in CaCl2-40% glycerol and I'm sure before transferring to -80 they were in unstable temperature, but they are still ok.
#5
Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:23 PM
Curtis, on Jun 26 2009, 12:35 PM, said:
our -80 broke down 2 weeks ago and I had to put my chemically TOP10 competent cells in -20 freezer for a week before transferring to a new -80. I checked my cells yesterday after transformation and they work fine and I have many colonies on agar plate.
I save my cells in CaCl2-40% glycerol and I'm sure before transferring to -80 they were in unstable temperature, but they are still ok.
yup. i dont have a -80 in lab n the downstair lab don work at odd hours. they been in -20 for awhile but still work.
#6
Posted 28 June 2009 - 05:06 AM
You can still check efficiency of transformation with standard plasmid like pUC18 before discarding the cells.
#7
Posted 30 June 2009 - 07:54 AM
ram, on Jun 28 2009, 06:06 AM, said:
You can still check efficiency of transformation with standard plasmid like pUC18 before discarding the cells.
I talked to invitrogen, two aplication scientists said two different things, one said, it is trash now, other said, -20 might be ok,
so tried transformation with pUC plasmid, got colonies, though they are not big, kind of small, but not too small, in my eyes it looks ok.
thanks
#8
Posted 03 July 2009 - 11:41 PM
http://www.sciencega...s/transform.htm
http://www.sigmaaldr...efficiency.html
#9
Posted 06 July 2009 - 06:39 AM
ram, on Jul 4 2009, 12:41 AM, said:
http://www.sciencega...s/transform.htm
http://www.sigmaaldr...efficiency.html
thanks for these links,
I did with the 2nd one as the 1 st one is not working. The result is:
Transformation Efficiency:
1e4 Transformants / μg DNA or
1e1 Transformants / ng of DNA
Does it look ok?
#10
Posted 06 July 2009 - 09:44 PM
Regards
Ram
Edited by ram, 06 July 2009 - 09:48 PM.
#12
Posted 08 July 2009 - 12:48 AM














