Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
- - - - -

FACS positive cells in negative controls help

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 ania



  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 12 June 2009 - 12:35 PM


I am beginner in flow cytometry. I am using FACS to analyze and sort adherent human cancer cells expressing receptor on the surface.
my problem is that lately i always see very high background in my negative controls. sometimes almost so high as positives in my samples :/

my negative control is lack of primary antibody (instead blocking in 5% milk) and then i add secondary antibody only.

i thought this was a problem with autofluorescence, but flow facility tech told me that patterns on my historgrams don't look like that. she thinks it is unlikely that the problem is autofluorescence, rather something else.
but what?

is it possible that i have so much of non-specific binding of secondary antibody? (i do not thing so, because in the past in my lab they did not have that problem and we are using antibody from the same company (invitrogen) forever). if yes, what to do? just try different antibody? or maybe i do not wash antibody out enough? i have no idea, what is wrong, but it drives me nuts.

do you have any suggestions what i can try? please, help :)

#2 Doki



  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 265 posts

Posted 13 June 2009 - 01:15 AM

Hello Ania,
At the beginning, we get a lots of problems but they will be solved if the protocol is right.

If U could post the FACS profile we could have some idea. About using milk for blocking, is that the standard protocol followed for the assay U r doing? U can have isotype control or no primary antibody as control and compare the results. If U search around, there might be papers mentioning the methodology for FCM for the cell type and antigen. Did U have 'cell only' as a control? How was it with that?

Good Luck.

Simple living, highnot thinking

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.