Weird BSA standard curve for Bradford assay
#1
Posted 12 June 2009 - 10:28 AM
Anyone knows bout this? can someone help? thanks!
#2
Posted 15 June 2009 - 07:12 AM
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
#3
Posted 07 July 2009 - 11:39 AM
For example...
I use a total of 1 ml for the Microassay. (800 µl water or PBS + 200 µl Bio-Rad Protein Assay Reagent)
If performing a Bradford on 5 µl of sample then add 5 µl of RIPA to the Blank or Standard + ? µl volume Standard + remaining volume up to 800 µl with Water. Then add Protein Reagent, mix, incubate, and read.
I hope this isn't too confusing!
#4
Posted 20 July 2009 - 08:45 PM
Any links to view?
#5
Posted 09 November 2009 - 12:08 AM
My standard curve looked fine, as it was BSA diluted in TE. I never tried to make a standard curve in any detergent-containing buffer.
However, based on this standard curve, I was told by the Bradford assay that all my samples were within 2-fold of each other. But then the bands on the gel (GAPDH) looked like there could be more like a 20-fold difference between the highest and lowest concentration.
The Bradford assay did rank the samples in almost the right order from highest to lowest concentration -- but the relative quantities were all off. I could also detect this by looking at the concentrations the Bradford told me -- and then doing the 2-fold or 1.5-fold dilutions which should bring them all to the same concentration -- only to find that it hardly had any effect on the relative differences.
Is this the sort of thing expected from samples lysed/diluted in RIPA buffer, which is only about 1.2% detergents? (No loading buffer/sample buffer had been added)
#6
Posted 09 November 2009 - 09:05 AM
MDavies, on Nov 9 2009, 03:08 AM, said:
My standard curve looked fine, as it was BSA diluted in TE. I never tried to make a standard curve in any detergent-containing buffer.
However, based on this standard curve, I was told by the Bradford assay that all my samples were within 2-fold of each other. But then the bands on the gel (GAPDH) looked like there could be more like a 20-fold difference between the highest and lowest concentration.
The Bradford assay did rank the samples in almost the right order from highest to lowest concentration -- but the relative quantities were all off. I could also detect this by looking at the concentrations the Bradford told me -- and then doing the 2-fold or 1.5-fold dilutions which should bring them all to the same concentration -- only to find that it hardly had any effect on the relative differences.
Is this the sort of thing expected from samples lysed/diluted in RIPA buffer, which is only about 1.2% detergents? (No loading buffer/sample buffer had been added)
you should always either add buffer to your standards or, at least, run buffer blanks to determine the offset caused by the buffer.
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
#7
Posted 04 February 2011 - 11:07 AM
Roo, on 07 July 2009 - 11:39 AM, said:
For example...
I use a total of 1 ml for the Microassay. (800 µl water or PBS + 200 µl Bio-Rad Protein Assay Reagent)
If performing a Bradford on 5 µl of sample then add 5 µl of RIPA to the Blank or Standard + ? µl volume Standard + remaining volume up to 800 µl with Water. Then add Protein Reagent, mix, incubate, and read.
I hope this isn't too confusing!
Hi all,
I am new to the forum and I had a question regarding the Bradford assay. I use a recipe for lysis buffer to lyse insect cells and I want to measure the protein concentration by bradford microassay. As such, I set up my bradford similarly to what Roo mentioned but using a final volume of 500ul
i.e. For the standard curve, BSA @ 1mg/ml(1ul,2ul,3ul......) + lysis buffer (5ul) + water (394ul, 393ul, 392ul.....) + Bradford reagent(100ul) . For my sample I add 5ul(already in lysis buffer) in 395ul water + 200ul Bradford reagent
When I read my sample concentration off the standard curve, what is the concentration units - is it ug/ml or ug/ul?
Also, what dilution factor do I need to multiply by to get the actual sample concentrations?
If using a 96 well plate, is the linear range the same as if using cuvettes?
Forgive the simplistic questions but I am getting confused trying to figure this out!
Thanx
#8
Posted 04 February 2011 - 12:25 PM
assuming it is a typo, you can evaluate the standard curve as mass (rather than concentration), hence, you have 1ug, 2ug, 3ug,...
you can determine concentration afterward (Xug/5ul).
Edited by mdfenko, 04 February 2011 - 12:26 PM.
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
#9
Posted 05 February 2011 - 01:38 AM
mdfenko, on 04 February 2011 - 12:25 PM, said:
assuming it is a typo, you can evaluate the standard curve as mass (rather than concentration), hence, you have 1ug, 2ug, 3ug,...
you can determine concentration afterward (Xug/5ul).
Thanks. Yes sorry that ws a typo. it should be 100ul.
#10
Posted 09 February 2011 - 03:43 PM
i do this even with a detergent compatible assay.













