Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Drug combinations


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 cardosopedro

cardosopedro

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 127 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 02 June 2009 - 07:57 AM

Hello!

I'm trying to assess the effect of some drug combinations in some cancer cell lines. I'm new in this world of pharmacology.

Can someone tell me how can I quantify the degree of synergism/additivism/antagonism that I obtain with my combinations? I only know the "combination index" method and the CalcuSyn software. However, I'm getting some nonsense values.

Also, is there any expert in this "combination index" method?

Thanks!!

#2 DRT

DRT

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 160 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 02 June 2009 - 03:01 PM

Iíve found this review to be the most helpful that Iíve encountered, though itís heavy going at times.

Ting-Chao Chou, ďTheoretical Basis. Experimental Design. and Computerized Simulation of Synergism and Antagonism in Drug Combination Studies,Ē Pharmacological Reviews 58, no. 3 (2006): 621-681.

Good luck!

#3 cardosopedro

cardosopedro

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 127 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 03 June 2009 - 03:37 AM

Iíve found this review to be the most helpful that Iíve encountered, though itís heavy going at times.

Ting-Chao Chou, ďTheoretical Basis. Experimental Design. and Computerized Simulation of Synergism and Antagonism in Drug Combination Studies,Ē Pharmacological Reviews 58, no. 3 (2006): 621-681.

Good luck!


Thank you for your answer. I've already read that paper. I was looking for alternatives to that method or find someone who is an expert in that method.

:D

#4 DRT

DRT

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 160 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 06 June 2009 - 05:45 PM

Thank you for your answer. I've already read that paper. I was looking for alternatives to that method or find someone who is an expert in that method.

:P


Your main consideration with alternate calculations/methods will be how they handle the Hill equation slope. If your compounds have cytotoxic curves which vary only in their IC50s (same slopes) any of the isobologram or CI based calculations will probably serve you well enough. However, (and this is possibly the reason you are getting strange results), if your compounds have disparate slopes then I think you might be stuck with an approach similar to Chou.
I tend to do all my calculations on my own spreadsheets so Iím sorry I canít offer any recommendations for alternate software.

#5 cardosopedro

cardosopedro

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 127 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 08 June 2009 - 12:47 AM

Thanks DRT.

Yes, you're right, the drugs that I use in the combinations have different slopes.

So, I'll have to use the CI approach.

Another controversy that I found out is whether you can classify by "synergism" when two drugs have a higher % inhibition compared with the sum of the % inhibition of the drugs alone. I believe this is too simplistic and also it's impossible to sum, for instance, 2 drugs that have 60% inhibition alone. Nevertheless, I think this is a reasonable method for sums < 100%.

What do you think?

And what's the best strategy? Constant-ratio or non-constant ratio combinations?

#6 DRT

DRT

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 160 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 08 June 2009 - 04:22 PM

Yeah; that term Ďsumí can be very misleading when working with %s. At the very least use the fractional products ie for two 60% inhibiting drugs:
100% - ((100% - 60%) x (100% - 60%)) = 84%


I tend to use constant ratios, but only because Iím usually asked to deconstruct an existing drug/herbal combination so the ratios are predetermined. Iíll have to have a longer think about this and post back in a couple of weeks (hectic exam time here).

#7 cardosopedro

cardosopedro

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 127 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 15 June 2009 - 03:02 AM

Thanks a lot!

#8 Gary456

Gary456

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 03 September 2009 - 04:10 AM

Thank you for interesting post ..
______________
Cigars online store




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.