Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!

Accuracy of virus counting methods

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Bob C

Bob C


  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 12 May 2009 - 10:35 AM

A question from a non-virologist...

Just how accurate are methods for enumerating viruses or getting estimates of viral titre?

For instance, just how accurate are plaque assays or TCID50 methods?

I've heard they are frequently no better than estimating to within a log !!!

Can this be true!!!!


#2 Curtis


    Metaller Scientist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,186 posts

Posted 12 May 2009 - 12:09 PM

the most accurate method is plaque assay I guess. because it will give you the number of active virus particles.

I also think methods can vary depending on the virus type. for example HA assay only applies to certain viruses like Influenza and NDV.

#3 microgirl



  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 122 posts

Posted 13 May 2009 - 07:54 AM

I think it's probably pretty true with plaque assay counts - but I also think it's true for bacteria with spread/spot plating. However, the more plates (replicates) you do, the more accuracy you get. It also depends on how well you dilute your cultures.

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.