Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

RT-PCR vs. conventional PCR


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 medstudent1

medstudent1

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 10 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 11 May 2009 - 10:22 PM

hey all,

i have had great results in amplifying a gene of interest with RT-PCR (Taqman) but have not been able to do so with conventional PCR (used multiple primer pairs including the same primers used for RT-PCR). i am struggling to find an answer as to why this is happening. any suggestions or pointers? my amplicon length for RT-PCR is around 60 bp and the expected range for conventional PCR is from 60-900 bp. my Ct value is approximately 30 for RT-PCR.

is it possible that conventional td-pcr (20:20 cycles) is not sufficient? from what i understand, i should be able to amplify my gene using 20:20 cycles, correct? (even when my Ct for RT-PCR is 30)? ive also tried 20:30 cycles to no avail...

im perplexed as to why i can amplify with RT-PCR and not conventional PCR and im not sure where to go from here....

#2 bob1

bob1

    Thelymitra pulchella

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,737 posts
400
Excellent

Posted 12 May 2009 - 05:41 PM

By RT-PCR are you meaning real time PCR (qPCR) or reverse transcription PCR (one step presumably if using Taqman)?

If you CT is 30, you should be able to see it after 40 cycles with conventional PCR, however, the fluorescent probes are much more sensitive than gels stained with EtBr or sybr-green/safe, so you still may not be able to see a band. If you are trying to resolve in an agarose gel, try using a polyacrylamide gel instead, it will work much better than agarose for this size product.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.