Hi friends... I have few queries to be solved...
1.How to calculate extinction coefficient for hemocyanin at 335nm?
For example:
hemocyanin concentration was calculated using an extinction coefficient (ΕmM1cm) of 17.26, calculated from (E1%1cm) = 2.83 (Nickerson & Van Holde 1971) on the basis of a functional subunit of 74 000 (Antonini & Brunori 1974).
2.If we have extinction coefficient, How to calculate molar concentration?
3.How consistant is this quantificaiton of biochemical compounds based on extinction coefficient?
I am unacquainted to this UV spectroscopy, please explain with funtamental concepts.
Thank you for reading my query
Extinction coefficient
Started by rajaram, May 07 2009 07:27 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 07 May 2009 - 07:27 PM
#2
Posted 10 May 2009 - 01:07 AM
1.How to calculate extinction coefficient for hemocyanin at 335nm?
The extinction coefficient is a measured value and can't be calculated.
2.If we have extinction coefficient, How to calculate molar concentration?
E=mM/cm
measured extinction value divided by extinction coefficient gives mmol compound
3.How consistant is this quantificaiton of biochemical compounds based on extinction coefficient?
The extinctioncoefficient is a constant, this means the consistancy of the quantification depends on the error in the measurement itself
The extinction coefficient is a measured value and can't be calculated.
2.If we have extinction coefficient, How to calculate molar concentration?
E=mM/cm
measured extinction value divided by extinction coefficient gives mmol compound
3.How consistant is this quantificaiton of biochemical compounds based on extinction coefficient?
The extinctioncoefficient is a constant, this means the consistancy of the quantification depends on the error in the measurement itself
Ockham's razor
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate
-- "You must assume no plural without necessity".
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate
-- "You must assume no plural without necessity".
#3
Posted 10 May 2009 - 03:48 PM
Dear Mr, Gerard,
Thank you very much for your prompt reply.
The following lines i've just copied from a Scientific paper, in this i could not understand E17.26 from 2.83...
"hemocyanin concentration was calculated using an extinction coefficient (ΕmM1cm) of 17.26, calculated from (E1%1cm) = 2.83 (Nickerson & Van Holde 1971) on the basis of a functional subunit of 74 000 (Antonini & Brunori 1974)."
Thank you very much for your prompt reply.
The following lines i've just copied from a Scientific paper, in this i could not understand E17.26 from 2.83...
"hemocyanin concentration was calculated using an extinction coefficient (ΕmM1cm) of 17.26, calculated from (E1%1cm) = 2.83 (Nickerson & Van Holde 1971) on the basis of a functional subunit of 74 000 (Antonini & Brunori 1974)."
#4
Posted 11 May 2009 - 01:59 PM
I dont understand it either.
I would calculate is as follows
1%=10g/1000ml=10/74000*1000 mmol/l=0.135mmol/l
E(0.135mM)1cm = 2.83
E(1mmol)1cm = 2.83*(1/0.135)=21.0
I would calculate is as follows
1%=10g/1000ml=10/74000*1000 mmol/l=0.135mmol/l
E(0.135mM)1cm = 2.83
E(1mmol)1cm = 2.83*(1/0.135)=21.0
Ockham's razor
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate
-- "You must assume no plural without necessity".
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate
-- "You must assume no plural without necessity".
#5
Posted 12 May 2009 - 11:44 AM
May be the %extinction coefficient 2.83 is wrong. Instead it would have been 2.33, if so, the answer is 17.2. By formula 2.83 gives 21.0. you are right.













