Jump to content


- - - - -

Taq introduces error after?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
4 replies to this topic

#1 jiajia1987

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 241 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 06:25 AM

Dear peeps,

I am doing an error-prone PCR and I am interested in introducing mutations in my gene. I have two pairs of primers flanking my gene, which is nearing 2kb in length. Does anyone know on average, Taq introduces a wrong nucleotide during extension after approximately how many base pairs? I have been trying to find this in journals, but I am unable to find any. please help!!!! :blink:!!

Thanks in advance!!

#2 mastermi

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 82 posts

Posted 17 April 2009 - 09:12 AM

I think it's one in a thousand. If you want to produce a lot of point mutations better use additional mutational conditions.

#3 jiajia1987

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 241 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 05:01 AM

View Postmastermi, on Apr 18 2009, 01:12 AM, said:

I think it's one in a thousand. If you want to produce a lot of point mutations better use additional mutational conditions.


Thanks for getting back to me. I am sorry for this late reply.

I am using MnCl2 and biased dNTPs to increase the mutations

#4 HomeBrew

    Veteran

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 951 posts

Posted 21 April 2009 - 06:30 AM

View Postjiajia1987, on Apr 17 2009, 10:25 AM, said:

Does anyone know on average, Taq introduces a wrong nucleotide during extension after approximately how many base pairs?


This is known in other circles as the "gambler's fallacy". If the rate of misincorporation is 1 in 1000, then *every* base has a 1 in 1000 chance of being wrong, just as there's no better chance of getting a good card hand just because you lost the last six hands in a row.

This assumes Taq is not more likely to misincorporate one base over another.

There are some error rate tables here, but reported error rates vary because they are condition dependent.

#5 jiajia1987

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 241 posts

Posted 27 April 2009 - 12:19 AM

View PostHomeBrew, on Apr 21 2009, 10:30 PM, said:

View Postjiajia1987, on Apr 17 2009, 10:25 AM, said:

Does anyone know on average, Taq introduces a wrong nucleotide during extension after approximately how many base pairs?


This is known in other circles as the "gambler's fallacy". If the rate of misincorporation is 1 in 1000, then *every* base has a 1 in 1000 chance of being wrong, just as there's no better chance of getting a good card hand just because you lost the last six hands in a row.

This assumes Taq is not more likely to misincorporate one base over another.

There are some error rate tables here, but reported error rates vary because they are condition dependent.


Thanks for the error rate table. :D





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2011 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.