Molecular Biologist Salary Range
#1
Posted 09 April 2009 - 08:42 AM
#2
Posted 11 April 2009 - 10:05 AM
Ahrenhase, on Apr 9 2009, 06:42 PM, said:
Learn to do good science, write grants, fund your own salary. Then, do good research, write papers, sit on committees AND fund the salary of your techs and students. After all this, you MAY be worth what you think you are. BUT....
Good luck!
I hope your message was a joke.....
#3
Posted 11 April 2009 - 07:12 PM
In general, I think that a higher education would eventually mean a better pay (it’s logical, right) unless one is really, really lucky. But then to get into a graduate program-that’s a whole new different story that you should seriously study and decide upon. Klinmed outlined the progression quite nicely too (if you skip some of the capped words). And although making good money is ideal, it shouldn’t be the major reason why you'd wanna go into grad school.....it can't be the end-all or be-all of our existence.
casandra
Edited by casandra, 11 April 2009 - 07:31 PM.
- hobglobin, personal comment about my beauteous photo......
#4
Posted 16 April 2009 - 06:51 AM
"Talent does what it can
Genius does what it must
I do what I get paid to do"
That's a statement.
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#5
Posted 16 April 2009 - 10:43 AM
hobglobin, on Apr 16 2009, 10:51 AM, said:
"Talent does what it can
Genius does what it must
I do what I get paid to do"
That's a statement.
i can't imagine to whom you are referring.
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
#6
Posted 16 April 2009 - 11:09 AM
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#7
Posted 16 April 2009 - 11:54 AM
hobglobin, on Apr 16 2009, 03:09 PM, said:
- hobglobin, personal comment about my beauteous photo......
#8
Posted 17 April 2009 - 08:09 AM
casandra, on Apr 16 2009, 03:54 PM, said:
Edited by mdfenko, 17 April 2009 - 10:19 AM.
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
#9
Posted 17 April 2009 - 11:38 AM
mdfenko, on Apr 17 2009, 12:09 PM, said:
casandra, on Apr 16 2009, 03:54 PM, said:
Well, I can do the archeology for you (instead of the math i.e.)........and I couldn't decide between a fossil and a dinosaur... ..you and phage are two of the wisest old men of the forum (oops, did I just make it worse.....
- hobglobin, personal comment about my beauteous photo......
#10
Posted 17 April 2009 - 11:45 AM
casandra, on Apr 17 2009, 09:38 PM, said:
mdfenko, on Apr 17 2009, 12:09 PM, said:
casandra, on Apr 16 2009, 03:54 PM, said:
Well, I can do the archeology for you (instead of the math i.e.)........and I couldn't decide between a fossil and a dinosaur... ..you and phage are two of the wisest old men of the forum (oops, did I just make it worse.....
You are as old as you feel. But let the sprogs have their fun. Living fossils are above such things.
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#11
Posted 17 April 2009 - 12:21 PM
hobglobin, on Apr 17 2009, 03:45 PM, said:
casandra, on Apr 17 2009, 09:38 PM, said:
mdfenko, on Apr 17 2009, 12:09 PM, said:
casandra, on Apr 16 2009, 03:54 PM, said:
Well, I can do the archeology for you (instead of the math i.e.)........and I couldn't decide between a fossil and a dinosaur... ..you and phage are two of the wisest old men of the forum (oops, did I just make it worse.....
You are as old as you feel. But let the sprogs have their fun. Living fossils are above such things.
- hobglobin, personal comment about my beauteous photo......
#12
Posted 20 April 2009 - 02:57 PM
if you 'only' have a BS, you will probably start pretty low unless you get VERY lucky. the job may not be very exciting. however, you'll pick up skills and a foundation for later.
by the time you've been in the field 5 years, maybe in one or two labs, you're doing a little better. probably not paid well (again, unless you're very lucky and get into the right job) but you're doing better and you have a solid experience base.
at this point, if you've done well at your job, you should be justified in asking for a little more money. by the time you're in the lab 10 years, if you've proven yourself to be a valuable asset, have your name on publications, do some writing, maybe even manage your own lab-slaves...at this point, you'll make anywhere from 35-75K depending on what sort of place you're working. the average is probably 45-50 at this point. the high end would be almost impossible, but you're most likely well over 35K if you have some work ethic and decent hands at the bench.
so....from everything I have heard from experienced parties: unless you go MD-PhD, or get a PhD and step into a very lucky, stable industry-position, your actual salary is not much higher.
would I trade ~15K a year that a PhD would give me for another 6 years of school and poverty? have to write my own grants and deal with even more paperwork than I do now?
it's not worth it to me. because of other factors in my life, I'm very glad I had delayed the decision to go to grad school.
do I ever regret not getting a PhD? sometimes...but only because I may have wasted some of my potential. I love my job. I have a lot of freedom to run my own studies, no one is micro-managing me, and I can do puzzles (science) all day long. I don't like to be an administrator. I could certainly stand to make more money, but no matter how much you make that's usually the way it goes














