Posted 10 May 2009 - 11:13 PM
Oh boy, here we go again. The first posting is fair enough, but then we rapidly spiral into the old "how dangerous EtBr is so use a 'safe' alternative (which often turns out to be more toxic than EtBr)".
EtBr has been used as a treatment for bovine parasites, being injected into cattle at 1 mg/kg. Thinking about your average cow, that's a heck of a lot of EtBr. Have there been reports of mutant cows? No. Have there been reports of mutant farmers who eat said cows, or drink their milk, or their blood (the farmers are Masai:- apparently it's quite a nice drink go figure). Again, no. Have there been reports of either cows or farmers getting teratomas? No. Even taking the racially adjusted nature of many Western news 'services', EtBr isn't the bogie-man it has been made out to be. Having said, you'd be a fool to work with it without wearing gloves, right? Be professional, be careful.
Rant over.
Hey mad, you can choose to add the EtBr into the gel, or in a post-gel staining bath. Don't add it to the loading buffer, because it could cause the fragments to migrate slower, especially as the EtBr goes in the opposite direction as the DNA.
Heart disease kills more women than breast cancer, but heart attack symptoms differ from men's symptoms. Get to know your heart... it could save your life.