Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Paraformaldehyde and immunofluorescence


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Mr Jefferson

Mr Jefferson

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 19 March 2009 - 03:45 PM

I'm using an Alexa (one of the red ones) secondary antibody. When I fix with 3% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes and permeablise with 0.025% TX-100 my background is mostly nuclear. I repeated my protocol without the permeabilisation step and it significantly reduced the nuclear background.

I suppose what I would like to know is whether paraformaldehyde on its own can disrupt the cell enough for antibody entry, yet with the permeabilisation step ommitted, the nucleus is resistant to antibody entry?

#2 bob1

bob1

    Thelymitra pulchella

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,627 posts
389
Excellent

Posted 19 March 2009 - 04:03 PM

If you fix with para, you need to permeabilise the cells before antibodies can efficiently enter the cells. If you have background, make sure that you are washing the paraformaldehyde off properly, at least 4 changes of PBS or TBS will be enough. Leaving overnight at 4 deg C in PBS helps too.

#3 Mr Jefferson

Mr Jefferson

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:11 AM

If you fix with para, you need to permeabilise the cells before antibodies can efficiently enter the cells. If you have background, make sure that you are washing the paraformaldehyde off properly, at least 4 changes of PBS or TBS will be enough. Leaving overnight at 4 deg C in PBS helps too.


I know that. My question is whether some antibody can still enter if I just use paraformaldehyde alone?

#4 rkay447

rkay447

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 177 posts
20
Excellent

Posted 20 March 2009 - 07:08 AM

No, antibodies are unable to enter the cell without the permiabilization step which explains why your nuclear background staining disappeared. What background you are still visualizing without the permiabilization is most likely antibodies binding the outside of the cell. Try using an antibody that stains a cytoplasmic protein to see it yourself. Without the permiabilization you won't be able to get good staining.

#5 scolix

scolix

    a student

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 314 posts
5
Neutral

Posted 21 March 2009 - 10:34 PM

It depends where the protein of interest is localised. If its inside the cell, you need to permebilise it. Try to reduce conc. of secondary ab. may be this helps.

#6 Curtis

Curtis

    Metaller Scientist

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,112 posts
59
Excellent

Posted 29 March 2009 - 01:46 AM

as Scolix said it depends where your protein of interest in localised.

but personally I really don't think permeabilization with Triton x100 is necessary in case of DAPI and Hoechst staining, because we do this every day in our lab and we never permeabilize. we stain less than 1 minute with 1ug/ml of DAPI or Hoechst after fixation with 3% Paraformaldehyde.

I've even detected proteins in cytoplasm and mitochondria membrane without permeabilization.

however I've never used antibodies that target nuclei proteins. maybe you would need to permeablize in case your protein of interest is inside nuclei.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.