Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
- - - - -

cDNA versus cRNA for a microarray

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 sran



  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 11 posts

Posted 05 March 2009 - 08:11 PM

Hi there,

I have been researching the various options for a microarray experiment I am setting up.

It seems there are two main possibilities - I can either label cDNA or label cRNA for binding to my microarray.

I am wondering about the pros and cons of the two methods. So far I get that:

- Using cDNA is cheaper and faster, because you don't have to perform an in vitro transcription step
- Using cDNA requires more starting material because there is no in vitro transcription.

Is there any other differences between the two methods? Binding efficiency? Labelling efficiency? I can't seem to find any publications that compare the methods.

cheers :)

#2 mdfenko


    an elder emeritus

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,266 posts

Posted 09 March 2009 - 11:48 AM

dna-rna hybridization is more stable (stronger) than dna-dna.

rna is more vulnerable to decomposition (rnases everywhere) until bound.

we use crna for gene expression arrays.
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.