I try to set standard curve by using BSA. I got R^2 = 0.987, is it acceptable?
0
How much R^2 that can be accept for standard curve of Bradford's assay?
Started by MT-TIKY, Mar 03 2009 02:00 AM
4 replies to this topic
#2
T C
-
- Active Members
-
- 277 posts
Veteran
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 03 March 2009 - 02:23 AM
Yup it is
ButI like BCA or Lowry more thn Bradford for protein estimation.
TC
ButI like BCA or Lowry more thn Bradford for protein estimation.
TC
MT-TIKY, on Mar 3 2009, 03:30 PM, said:
I try to set standard curve by using BSA. I got R^2 = 0.987, is it acceptable?
#3
MT-TIKY
-
- Members
-
- 2 posts
member
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 03 March 2009 - 03:01 AM
T C, on Mar 3 2009, 05:23 PM, said:
Yup it is
ButI like BCA or Lowry more thn Bradford for protein estimation.
TC
ButI like BCA or Lowry more thn Bradford for protein estimation.
TC
MT-TIKY, on Mar 3 2009, 03:30 PM, said:
I try to set standard curve by using BSA. I got R^2 = 0.987, is it acceptable?
THANKS
#4
Nrelo
-
- Active Members
-
- 71 posts
Enthusiast
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 03 March 2009 - 05:06 AM
T C, on Mar 3 2009, 02:23 AM, said:
Yup it is
ButI like BCA or Lowry more thn Bradford for protein estimation.
TC
ButI like BCA or Lowry more thn Bradford for protein estimation.
TC
MT-TIKY, on Mar 3 2009, 03:30 PM, said:
I try to set standard curve by using BSA. I got R^2 = 0.987, is it acceptable?
lowry has a higher chemical competibility than bradford
#5
bob1
-
- Global Moderators
-
- 4,425 posts
Thelymitra pulchella
233
Excellent
Excellent
Posted 03 March 2009 - 03:27 PM
MT-TIKY, on Mar 3 2009, 03:00 AM, said:
I try to set standard curve by using BSA. I got R^2 = 0.987, is it acceptable?
It depends: Does the line fit the data (i.e. would a curve fit better?)? What are your residual plots like - random, non-random? Do you have any points on your standard curve outside of the given sensitivities of the Bradford assay?
