Tampering With Things Man Was Not Meant to Know
#1
Posted 28 February 2009 - 02:14 PM
It has come to my attention, there are books to teach us how to survive post apocalyptic world that may come. Such useful books as “How to Survive a Robot Uprising” and “The Zombie Survival Guide”
Yet there is not a single book, or even list of safety instructions for young aspiring scientist. If we do not learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it. And this is no mere rhetoric. Please recall the case of Dr Jekyll. A simple change in experimental protocol, the mere avoidance of self experimentation and he would have avoided disaster. But disaster he did meet and no lessons were learn as the same mistake were made by Dr. Jack Griffin, who discovered and lost the secret of invisibility. And again by Dr. Seth Brundle, who developed the teleporter and met with personal disaster due to the presence of a fly. Losing all hope of getting a date.
A simple set of rules would help the young scientist who wishes to push the boundaries of knowledge in the lands that man was not meant to know, would be helpful.
For starter I shall propose
1) No self experimentation. While producing less satisfactory observations, all human experimentation should be conducted on others. A level of self control must be maintained. Less haste, and you would avoid the disaster faced by Dr Jekyll.
#2
Posted 28 February 2009 - 02:25 PM
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#3
Posted 28 February 2009 - 07:30 PM
- hobglobin, personal comment about my beauteous photo......
#4
Posted 01 March 2009 - 03:12 AM
Edited by hobglobin, 01 March 2009 - 06:48 AM.
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#5
Posted 01 March 2009 - 08:02 AM
- hobglobin, personal comment about my beauteous photo......
#6
Posted 01 March 2009 - 05:47 PM
7. Further to point 2, do not hire body part collectors / research assistants who are not properly qualified. Hunchbacks just won't do, even (especially?) if they are your wife's cousin's idiot son!
#7
Posted 01 March 2009 - 06:01 PM
9. Further to points 2,4 and 7 always site your laboratory away from villages that have excess supplies of pitchforks and burning torches.
#8
Posted 02 March 2009 - 07:44 AM
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#9
Posted 02 March 2009 - 04:47 PM
#10
Posted 02 March 2009 - 08:24 PM
13. As a corollary to point 10, you can't make them AI esp androids also more gorgeous and perfect-looking than yourself either. It can't be good for your self-esteem and not if you're the stereotypically looking-like-a-mad man mad scientist (with every day a bad hair day).
- hobglobin, personal comment about my beauteous photo......
#11
Posted 03 March 2009 - 03:13 AM
Edited by hobglobin, 03 March 2009 - 03:14 AM.
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#12
Posted 03 March 2009 - 02:51 PM
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.
#13
Posted 03 March 2009 - 03:55 PM
- hobglobin, personal comment about my beauteous photo......
#14
Posted 03 March 2009 - 04:20 PM
#15
Posted 04 March 2009 - 01:23 PM
One must presume that long and short arguments contribute to the same end. - Epicurus
...except casandra's that belong to the funniest, most interesting and imaginative (or over-imaginative?) ones, I suppose.














