
current impact factor list?
#1
Posted 23 February 2009 - 02:21 PM
I was hoping to find a link to an updated list using the search tool, but nothing more current than 2005 popped up for me.
does anyone have a good link? if it's not a big hassle, would you please post it here?
thank you
A
#2
Posted 23 February 2009 - 05:46 PM
#3
Posted 25 February 2009 - 06:45 AM
Check your PM.
I wish you had sent it here so we could download it too. I need it too.

#4
Posted 25 February 2009 - 02:55 PM
#5
Posted 13 April 2009 - 10:18 PM
#6
Posted 14 April 2009 - 07:10 AM
impact list check this website. I use this one for the impact lists. The latest list is 2007 list, however they do not make seperate lists for different catergories.
If you want a list that uses different categories you need to check this one, but thats only updated till 2003-2006 depending on the category.
good luck with it.
If you don't know it, then ask it! Better to ask and look foolish to some than not ask and stay stupid.
#7
Posted 15 April 2009 - 09:53 PM
#8
Posted 17 April 2009 - 12:46 AM
#9
Posted 17 September 2009 - 07:03 AM

Attached Files
#10
Posted 19 November 2009 - 08:44 AM
A. Einstein
#11
Posted 20 November 2009 - 08:51 AM

In was told that PLOS One was still too young.
A. Einstein
#13
Posted 01 December 2009 - 08:46 AM
I asked because I reviewed an average paper recently. It was OK (but only OK) and I accepted it with revisions. Much later (and thanks to this topic), I found out that the journal in which this paper had been submitted had a pretty high impact factor. I wonder if I should have accepted the paper now. I don't think it was interesting enough to go in such a high ranked journal.
A. Einstein
#14
Posted 01 December 2009 - 08:54 AM
i think you should review papers on their own merits. the publication (and its impact factor) should not be part of your review process (let the editors worry about that). what you did was fine.One question for those who review articles. Do you take the journal (and its IP) into consideration?
I asked because I reviewed an average paper recently. It was OK (but only OK) and I accepted it with revisions. Much later (and thanks to this topic), I found out that the journal in which this paper had been submitted had a pretty high impact factor. I wonder if I should have accepted the paper now. I don't think it was interesting enough to go in such a high ranked journal.
talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i used to do what i got paid to do
#15
Posted 04 December 2009 - 08:54 AM
Ah well, the authors of this one got lucky

A. Einstein