20 replies to this topic

[aimikins]

hey everyone -

I was hoping to find a link to an updated list using the search tool, but nothing more current than 2005 popped up for me.

does anyone have a good link? if it's not a big hassle, would you please post it here?

thank you
A

[bioforum]

Check your PM.

[Curtis]

bioforum, on Feb 23 2009, 05:46 PM, said:

Check your PM.

I wish you had sent it here so we could download it too. I need it too.

[miRNA man]

Yes, I would also like the list to find out what top journals I won't be publishing in this year :-D.

[Bela]

Yes pls provide a list over here.

[pito]

to all:


impact list check this website. I use this one for the impact lists. The latest list is 2007 list, however they do not make seperate lists for different catergories.

If you want a list that uses different categories you need to check this one, but thats only updated till 2003-2006 depending on the category.


good luck with it.

[Bela]

Thanks!This was helpful.

[tonix37]

Thanks!

[calvin*]

Hey guyz.... I have got 2008 Impact Factor list pdf arranged alphabetically. Hope its useful

Attached Files

•  Impact_Factor_2008.pdf   344.28K   461 downloads

[Maddie]

How come they don't  mention PLOS One?

[Maddie]

Well, I'll answer my own question   .
In was told that PLOS One was still too young.

[lucilius]

Microbes and Environment (website) isnt in the list either , anyone an idea why?

Is it possible its too small or not well known?

It seems a big journal in japan?

[Maddie]

One question for those who review articles. Do you take the journal (and its IP) into consideration?
I asked because I reviewed an average paper recently. It was OK (but only OK) and I accepted it with revisions. Much later (and thanks to this topic), I found out that the journal in which this paper had been submitted had a pretty high impact factor. I wonder if I should have accepted the paper now. I don't think it was interesting enough to go in such a high ranked journal.

[mdfenko]

Maddie, on Dec 1 2009, 11:46 AM, said:

One question for those who review articles. Do you take the journal (and its IP) into consideration?
I asked because I reviewed an average paper recently. It was OK (but only OK) and I accepted it with revisions. Much later (and thanks to this topic), I found out that the journal in which this paper had been submitted had a pretty high impact factor. I wonder if I should have accepted the paper now. I don't think it was interesting enough to go in such a high ranked journal.

i think you should review papers on their own merits. the publication (and its impact factor) should not be part of your review process (let the editors worry about that). what you did was fine.

[Maddie]

Really? OK good. So why don't I feel good about it?
Ah well, the authors of this one got lucky