IP problem: antibody binds too few antigen
Posted 19 February 2009 - 05:47 AM
I'm trying to establish IP in our lab. My problem is that after IP my IgG band is much stronger then the antigen band. If IP would be perfect, then should't the antigen band be about as strong as the IgG band? (I use the same antibody for IP as for the subsequent Western blot).
I ran on my gel the original lysate (that has not been immunoprecipitated) and the supernatant of the IP reaction too, and in the IP supernatant there is as much antigen as in the unprecipitated lysate. And the solute eluted from the beads (that is the precipitated sample) contains as much (or even a little less) antigen as the unprecipitated sample in spite that the immunoprecipitated sample must be much more concentrated then the unprecipitated one.
I tried to reduce the ammount of the antibody, but in that case both, the IgG and the antigen band were lowered in the IP sample. Why does not bind my antibody more antigen? (The antibody I use is very good.)
Any answer would be appreciated.
Posted 19 February 2009 - 06:10 AM
but if you don't want to see the Ig band in your western, you should use a HRP-conjugated protein G instead of the HRP-conjugated anti Ig. protein G will mainly recognize the native primary antibody you use to detect the antigen, but not the denatured Ig that are loaded on the gel.
Posted 19 February 2009 - 06:47 AM
Nevertheless, later the presence of the IgG band might be a factor to consider, and so thanks for the idea. So far I have thought of crosslinking as a method to eliminate the IgG band, but this other method might work as well.
So the question is: why doesn't my antibody bind more antigen?
Posted 19 February 2009 - 07:38 AM
When I want to purify an antigen, I dilute more my sample, and I load the sample on a column where the antigen is covalently linked. the antigen is eluted by decreasing the pH.
I don't know if others have a concentration of their antigen after IP?
Posted 19 February 2009 - 08:31 AM
Posted 19 February 2009 - 10:38 AM
What is the species of your primary?
Is it the same as your secondary?
If so, it is likely anything you see is an artifact. Primary and secondary
antibodies really should be different species. This is especially true for Rabbit and Goat antibodies.
What size is your protein?
Why do you think the amount of your IPed protein would be equal intensity to your IgG band?
This is utter nonsense. Your IgG band will always be stronger. You antibody may not be very efficient.
Posted 19 February 2009 - 12:58 PM
About artefacts: I hope, it is not. I have a band at around 50 kDa (it must be the IgG, as it is missing from the control sample and more importantly it is missing from the non precipitated sample). The other band is a bit higher and it seems to be O.K., as the antigen is protein kinase B (Akt), whose mol weight is aroun 56 kDa.
In the non-immunoprecipitated sample (and in the supernatant of the IP reaction) two strong bands are present (the higher one a bit stronger but the lower one a bit more compact) while in the IP samples only the lower, more compact band can be seen (and the IgG of course). It is important that first I tried to catch estrogen receptor alpha, but failed. In that case I saw the IgG band only. So I hope that my other band in the last IP recations is the Akt.
I used 400 mcl lysate for the IP reactions and at the end eluted the beads in a volume of 80 mcl (including the beads). Non precipitated samples were the original lysates diluted with 2x sample buffer. And after Western blot I see that the IP reaction contains as much (or a little lower) ammount of Akt as the non-precipitated samples. It is not what I expected.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 12:04 AM
Posted 20 February 2009 - 01:44 AM
protein-antigen interaction has the higher affinity
Posted 20 February 2009 - 02:35 AM
I never tried this way.
normally you have an excess of antibody compared to antigen, and an excess of beads compared to antibodies, to be sure to IP as much of antigen as possible (that's why you will always have a higher band for antibodies than for antigens.
if you incubate first the beads and antibody, one could say that you could have a sterical "encombrement" that doesn't allow the antigen to bind to the antibody; or not so well.
I don't know. Have a try
Posted 20 February 2009 - 03:18 AM
This sterical inhibition is something to consider. Next week I'm going to try IP with more beads (I used 20 mcl of it (50% packe volume). I'll go on with 40 mcl. And anyway I will try the "antibody first with the bads" method too.
But unfortunately I can't affors to use antibidies of different orgin to IP than to the subsequent Western blot.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 05:00 AM
Posted 20 February 2009 - 08:34 AM
with polyclonals, especially if made against whole protein, you will see more than one molecule of antibody binding to one molecule of antigen.
you can see how this might affect the intensity of staining.
genius does what it must
i do what i get paid to do
Posted 20 February 2009 - 11:56 AM
I think hormone receptors can be very difficult to IP.
You might want to think about transfecting in a myc-tagged estrogen receptor or FLAG-tagged and IPing
with the Flag (or myc) antibody.
Here is a recent paper where they did some co-IP with the Estrogen receptor.
Note that they use different species of antibody for IP and Western
However, if you are Co-IPing for the Estrogen Receptor and Western blotting for the Estrogen receptor the
intensity fo the band in your Western should be strong enough to out power any background.
Regulation of estrogenic effects by beclin 1 in breast cancer cells.
John S, Nayvelt I, Hsu HC, Yang P, Liu W, Das GM, Thomas T, Thomas TJ.
Cancer Res. 2008 Oct 1;68(19):7855-63.