Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

RNA isolation form HUVEC


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 chrisbelle

chrisbelle

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 58 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 14 February 2009 - 08:59 PM

Hi people!!

I've been extracting RNA from my HUVEC cells, do they look ok? I'm familiar with fungal RNA, but the HUVEC RNA doesn't look quite like I expected. The 28S band doesn't seem like it is 2x intensity of the 18S band. I used the Qiagen RNeasy Minikit, used the buffer RLT + B-mercaptoethanol added to monolayer and pipetted several times. Then pipetted into microfuge tube and vortexed 30sec. Then continued with the rest of the kit protocol.

I've also tried Trizol, yield is higher but protocol takes more time so I prefer the Qiagen kit. Is there anything I've done wrong? Only I haven't done DNase digestion, plan to do that today and run another gel and see.

First picture's Trizol has nothing, I don't know what happened there. 2nd pix is another batch of HUVEC RNA + Candida RNA run on fornmaldehyde gel. 3rd pix is the same RNA run on normal agarose gel.
All RNA reverse transcribed and PCR with b-actin gave correct bands.

I use 5x104 cells per well.
Thanks!!

Chris

Attached Thumbnails

  • 6_2_09_Trizol_n_Qiagen_test_RNA.JPG
  • 10_10_08_HUVEC_RNA.JPG
  • 13_10_08_NORMAL_AGAROSE_huvec_rna.JPG

Edited by chrisbelle, 14 February 2009 - 09:02 PM.

Life sucks. Enjoy it while you can.

#2 AquaPlasmid

AquaPlasmid

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 74 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 18 February 2009 - 11:38 AM

The RNA looks right in the normal gel. Maybe your formaldehyde had gone bad.

#3 bob1

bob1

    Thelymitra pulchella

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,666 posts
396
Excellent

Posted 18 February 2009 - 03:26 PM

The RNA looks OK to me too. If the PCR is working is there really an issue?

#4 chrisbelle

chrisbelle

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 58 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 18 February 2009 - 07:42 PM

The RNA looks OK to me too. If the PCR is working is there really an issue?


If the formaldehyde had gone bad then the RNA for the Candida sp should not be so clear. The Candida RNA is very nice.
Yes purity and RNA integrity is an issue cause I'm going to use it for microarray.
I've had suggestions that my cells are not enough, and that I should extract from a T25/T75 flask instead of the 24-plate wells. But purity and integrity should be good no matter the concentration right?

Please any other ideas? maybe I should change my kit reagents to new ones. But then the Trizol method also gives lousy bands, even the 28S becomes blur.

Thanks
Chris
Life sucks. Enjoy it while you can.

#5 AquaPlasmid

AquaPlasmid

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 74 posts
7
Neutral

Posted 19 February 2009 - 09:11 AM

Try add some NaCl (10mM final would be good) to your loading buffer, then heat and load to the gel. Sometimes difference in ion binding to the RNA (and DNA) could make a big difference in its gel migration pattern. Your yeast RNA's salt content might be different from the HUVEC RNA.




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.