Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Use of streptavidin-coated magnetic beads to obtain ssDNA


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 mint

mint

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 13 February 2009 - 05:58 AM

Hi all,

I am trying to purify 86 nucleotide ssDNA. Had anyone used dynabeads M-280 Streptavidin for ssDNA purification before?

I immobilized dsDNA (one strand with biotin, another strand with FAM) to the streptavidin bead.

I tried out two ways (heat and NaOH) to dissociate the non-biotinylated strand from the biotinylated strand following the suggestion given on the invitrogen product FAQ. However, when I run purified ssDNA on the agarose gel, I get a band at much larger molecular weight than the correct molecular weight of ssDNA.

Why is this so?

History of sample applied to dynabeads:
1) PCR reaction to obtain dsDNA
2) PCR product purification to remove primers (which is successful and produced a band on agarose gel at the correct molecular weight)
3) Apply purified PCR product to dynabeads.

Even if I do assymmetric PCR, standard gel extraction kit from Qiagen for instance will give very low yield for 86 nucleotide ssDNA (maybe 10-20%). Or is there any other method to obtain ssDNA after PCR?

Any help or suggestion will be greatly appreciated. Many thanks in advance.

#2 phage434

phage434

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,484 posts
251
Excellent

Posted 13 February 2009 - 09:05 AM

Your ssDNA will not run in the same way as a dsDNA sample of the same length will on a non-denaturing agarose gel. ssDNA will fold and form complexes, with unpredictable results. You need to run the ssDNA on a denaturing gel. Easiest is a PAGE gel, which should give very good resolution at 86 bp.

#3 mint

mint

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 14 February 2009 - 02:31 AM

Thanks for the suggestion. However, when I run the assymmetric PCR product on agarose gel, I can see clearly two dna bands. The higher band of which is dsDNA and the lower band of which is ssDNA. So I think something must have happened to the ssDNA during strand separation using the bead... which I havent figured out why..

Your ssDNA will not run in the same way as a dsDNA sample of the same length will on a non-denaturing agarose gel. ssDNA will fold and form complexes, with unpredictable results. You need to run the ssDNA on a denaturing gel. Easiest is a PAGE gel, which should give very good resolution at 86 bp.



#4 Shifting Reality

Shifting Reality

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 24 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 02 August 2014 - 08:11 AM

Hello,

 

I've made a little research about streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. I would like to immobilize biotinylated PCR products. I have 3 candidate products. Theoretically, all of these items are ideal for this purpose.

 

There is huge price difference between these products (and some differences in certain parameters).

 

- Dynabeads® M-280 Streptavidin ; bead diameter: 2,8 um ; Binding Capacity (free biotin): 650-900 pmoles/mg beads ; concentration: 10 mg/ml ; 10 ml : 1 500 $

 

- solulink ; bead diameter: 0,8 um ; Binding Capacity (free biotin):  > 14 nmol/mg ; concentration: 10 mg/ml ; 10 ml: 800 $

 

spherotech ; bead diameter: 0,5 - 4.5 um ; Binding Capacity (free biotin): no described ; concentration: 0,5 - 1 w/v % ; 10 ml: 200-250 $

 

But I don't know what so special in M-280 making it very expensive. :)

 

Can anybody tell me what I should choose ?

 

Thanks for the answer ! :)






Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.