Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
- - - - -

real time RT-PCR, 1-step vs. 2-step method

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 rajah



  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 13 posts

Posted 13 February 2009 - 01:52 AM


could someone with a bit more experience than I have (Im naive to this method yet) describe me the pros and cons of 1-step versus 2-step real time reverse transcription PCR. Meaning that when it would be better to do the reverse transcription separately and when in one and the same tube along with the PCR. The 1-step method is of course tempting but there must be some disadvantages too. Thank you, I appreciate the effort!

Edited by rajah, 13 February 2009 - 01:56 AM.

#2 littleaxt



  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 35 posts

Posted 13 February 2009 - 02:06 AM


if you use a one-step reaction you simply can not make replicates of your sample in you real-time PCR. Means you can not distinguish if occouring variance is due to your RT-reaction or your real-time PCR.
Another reason might be that you have to split up sample after the RT-reaction if you use SYBR-green and want to amplify more than one gen. Otherwise you should not compare these genes with each other, as the RT-efficiencies might vary between different reactions.

hope it helped,


#3 tea-test



  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 169 posts

Posted 13 February 2009 - 05:56 AM

In my opinion, one-step has its eligibility only in diagnostic or forensic laboratories were cross contamination or pipetting errors would have profound consequences. For research use I would always go for two-step. it is far more convenient.
tea-test: The artist formerly known as Ned Land

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.