You could probably say: the most abundant, widely distributed organism is probable the most fit (given all the various selection pressures on earth) - then that would probably be bacteria?
And I'd definitely second the statement that evolution is a non-random process.
0
18 replies to this topic
#17
-
- Active Members
-
- 37 posts
Enthusiast
Posted 11 January 2010 - 08:11 AM
warsel, on Nov 25 2009, 09:25 AM, said:
You could probably say: the most abundant, widely distributed organism is probable the most fit (given all the various selection pressures on earth) - then that would probably be bacteria?
And I'd definitely second the statement that evolution is a non-random process.
And I'd definitely second the statement that evolution is a non-random process.
the irony, all life survives based on a randomly mutated mechanism that produces non random results
#18
-
- Active Members
-
- 22 posts
Enthusiast
Posted 09 October 2010 - 12:05 AM
Human is the most evolved and the fittest one to survive because human is the most dominating specie.
You can also go through biology practice questions to gain more knowledge by attempting questions.
Regards
Rupam
You can also go through biology practice questions to gain more knowledge by attempting questions.
Regards
Rupam
#19
-
- Members
-
- 1 posts
member
Posted 13 December 2010 - 07:41 AM
gebirgsziege, on 24 September 2009 - 10:35 PM, said:
Yes all organisms are evolved enough to be alive, but some are adopting quicker than others towards changing environmental challages than others.......but I think nobody can say "this organism is more evolved than another"........but I think you can not say they are equally evolved either.
And: are we talking about "evolution" or "adaption" here?????
And: are we talking about "evolution" or "adaption" here?????
Yes none can say which organism has evolved more...but one can say which organism is more favored by the evolutionary forces.....
