Here is a rather broad question:
how do I know whether a 'gene' is a 'real gene'? (I have checked whether it appeared in the EST database) Whatelse needs to be done to be sure that it is a real gene?
thanks millions in advance!
The definition of a real gene?
Started by eleceyes, Feb 20 2005 11:49 AM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 20 February 2005 - 11:49 AM
#2
Posted 20 February 2005 - 08:26 PM
the definition of gene is ever-changing. I don't know what the gold standard of a gene is today, but I think if it gets transcribed, then its a gene (accounts for rRNAs and tRNAs which never become translated).
#3
Posted 22 February 2005 - 03:24 PM
Hi,
There have been zillions of discussions over what a comprehensive definition of a "real" gene can be. It is kind of a tough question though it sounds so elementary. A basic unit of heredity, that encodes a product or even codes for just RNA like rRNA or tRNA that do not end up as proteins, with 5' and 3' UTRs, with intervening sequences in eukaryotes.
Thanks,
Phantom
There have been zillions of discussions over what a comprehensive definition of a "real" gene can be. It is kind of a tough question though it sounds so elementary. A basic unit of heredity, that encodes a product or even codes for just RNA like rRNA or tRNA that do not end up as proteins, with 5' and 3' UTRs, with intervening sequences in eukaryotes.
Thanks,
Phantom
#4
Posted 26 February 2005 - 06:41 AM
I believe yu are trying to see if your gene is an ORF. Then check your sequence for a promoter, start codon and a stop codon. If you can find them, then its a coding DNA; a gene, DNA portion with a property.
Sharath B.













