Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

stable transfection: need of picking single colonies


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 ArminR

ArminR

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 03 January 2005 - 07:29 AM

in my last lab, i was told never to use stable lines if i want to compare expression levels of different mutants. the reason for that was that different clones from even same mutant can have totally tifferent expression levels due to their integration sites at the genome.

so far.....

in my NEW lab, we do not pick single colonies while establisthing stable lines and take ALL cells that survive selection medium. so, i was told, we generate a kind of average expression level (because we have strong and weak expressing clones in that population). and because this average expression level, we can use stable cell lines to compare expression levels of tifferent protein mutants.


what do you think about that "average expression thing"?

#2 wirly

wirly

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 60 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 10 January 2005 - 05:15 PM

It *seems* that the everage thing could have so many variables due to individual DNA prep quality, tranfection efficiency, tranfectant cell viability, etc etc, that you would be hard pressed to control for all of the variables in your experiment to say that it was the mutation that was making X% change in expression. Maybe simply a ton of repetitions with various DNA preps and different transfection reagents with the same results could get someone to believe but I might not hang my paper on that evidence alone.

What type of promoter are you driving it from: endogenous or forgein?




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.