Jump to content


- - - - -

designed primer more powerful?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
2 replies to this topic

#1 hslab

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 19 October 2004 - 02:17 PM

hi, I am doing methyaltion of one tumor supressor gene, and to my interest, I design a pair of primer according the methprimer web online, I determine the methylation status with both primer from the reference and prime I design, and I found the positivity is obvious high with desighed primer than that with primer from reference, is it possible?

#2 sage

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPip
  • 45 posts

Posted 19 October 2004 - 04:07 PM

Are you doing MSP? Do you mean you got more methylated amplifications with methprimer designed primers than primers from references?

The problem is which result is closer to the reality. Generally speaking, software designed primers are better than manually picked primers because primers are screened by the program against many criteria and only those that pass the test are returned to the user. For MSP, I would say all MSP primers should be tested by sequencing before they are used for sample screening.

#3 chrisadam

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 13 August 2010 - 03:32 AM

The compounds that were more strongly attracted to the particles slowed . Column liquid chromatography is the most powerful and has the highest . Gravity or vacuum can be used for columns that are not designed to withstand pressure.


_____________________________________________________________


Want to get-on Google's first page and loads of traffic to your website? Hire a SEO Specialist from Ocean Groups seo pecialist





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2011 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.