Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

designed primer more powerful?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 hslab

hslab

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 19 October 2004 - 02:17 PM

hi, I am doing methyaltion of one tumor supressor gene, and to my interest, I design a pair of primer according the methprimer web online, I determine the methylation status with both primer from the reference and prime I design, and I found the positivity is obvious high with desighed primer than that with primer from reference, is it possible?

#2 sage

sage

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 45 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 19 October 2004 - 04:07 PM

Are you doing MSP? Do you mean you got more methylated amplifications with methprimer designed primers than primers from references?

The problem is which result is closer to the reality. Generally speaking, software designed primers are better than manually picked primers because primers are screened by the program against many criteria and only those that pass the test are returned to the user. For MSP, I would say all MSP primers should be tested by sequencing before they are used for sample screening.

#3 chrisadam

chrisadam

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 13 August 2010 - 03:32 AM

The compounds that were more strongly attracted to the particles slowed . Column liquid chromatography is the most powerful and has the highest . Gravity or vacuum can be used for columns that are not designed to withstand pressure.


_____________________________________________________________


Want to get-on Google's first page and loads of traffic to your website? Hire a SEO Specialist from Ocean Groups seo pecialist




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.