#16
Posted 03 July 2009 - 09:59 AM
The NTC gives me a peak almost every time, I set up a reaction. Currently I am using Roche 480 and analyzing expression of my target gene compared to the housekeeper i.e actin. One other problem is that in my untreated samples (I work with mosquito larvae and expose them to bacteria and use real time PCR to check presence and no. of bacteria) I am getting a low Ct value for my bacterial specific gene, but I am confused as to why would I see any presence of bacteria in my control samples? Also, my target bacterial gene is very specific and should come up positive only if my bacterium is present in the mosquito larvae. Also, is actin expression affected by anything? AS in since actin is my housekeeper gene, should i not be getting the same levels of actin present in day 1 of my treatment and on day3 an day 9? Does it vary with size of the larvae? Is there anyway I can ensure that I have the same amount of actin across all my samples?
Please help..
Thanks,
-Uma
#17
Posted 04 August 2009 - 03:35 AM
Quote
I faced this problem before and the culprit were the PCR tubes. Especially if u use strips without individual caps (or worse, a whole plate with the film covering) this could be a problem since samples in one strip are open till reagents and samples are added in all other wells and closed with the common strip cap or film. And I had this other experience where the tubes had faint cracks in them, not seen with the naked eye, but do make sure ur products are the same volume after the run to ensure u havent used a cracked tube. This could be a possible source of contamination from one run to another.
#18
Posted 06 August 2009 - 10:26 PM
..."best of our knowledge, as far as we know this had never been reported before, though I can't possible read all the published journals on earth, but by perform thorough search in google, the keywords did not match any documents"...
"what doesn't kill you, makes you stronger"---Goddess Casandra reminds me to be strong
"It's all just DNA. Do it."---phage434
#19
Posted 04 September 2009 - 04:32 PM
uvbox, on Sep 5 2009, 12:31 PM, said:
I think i might also have lots of DNA as my samples are from fresh human blood and i've extracted RNA from it. Would it help if i bump up my DNase I enzyme treatment? e.g. use 3ul instead of 2 ul etc
Any help much appreciated!
Edited by uvbox, 04 September 2009 - 04:33 PM.
#20
Posted 24 January 2011 - 04:05 PM
desperate measures call for a hood! use a laminar flow hood or even better a biological safety cabinet to set up your reactions. if you use a bsc you can sterile it before hand by turning on the UV and the fan for 20 minutes prior to setting up your reaction
Good luck! wait a couple days between reaction setup to limit contamination and tell your lab mates to keep any materials, including their gloves away from the areas you are going to use for setup. I freak out when people bring their gloves from the gel room into the qPCR room.
#21
Posted 31 January 2011 - 07:14 AM
it is seen that sometime the lab platform where u do all reactions is not able to be free of contamination so try to carry uor work in a different lab or place away from dust etc. i think it will work definitely. also tell us that is uor required band is coming or not.???
#22
Posted 17 April 2011 - 06:51 PM
#23
Posted 16 July 2011 - 07:03 PM
#24
Posted 15 August 2011 - 11:25 PM
#25
Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:59 PM
m i first year of my phd and right now i am facing lot of problems...particularly in the real time pcr..the problem is that i am getting "SPECIFIC" amplification also in NTC ... m target band is around 180 bp which i am seeing in the samples but also in NTC ..m doing real time PCR for checking promoter occupancy of some proteins using CHIP... i have tried everything i could do to get rid of this problem.. cleaned pipettes, changed gloves, changed water. autoclaved Sigma water and then kept it in UV..kept pipettes in UV hood ..changed primer stocks, changed syber green .. i have done everything me and my boss could think of. i tried doing the PCR set up in hood...even i gave my samples for some other persons in lab even they got the same porblems... both NTC and samples are showing amplification at the same Ct value...looking forward for help by u people
Bye...
#26
Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:38 AM
I never trust anything that can't be doubted.
#27
Posted 16 January 2012 - 01:17 AM
#28
Posted 21 February 2012 - 09:38 AM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: pcr, contamination
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Tissue and Cell Culture →
Housekeeper for HEK cells?Started by Guest_Stephp_* , 17 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Molecular Cloning →
Cloning large fragmentsStarted by Guest_bknm_* , 15 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
Can't get PCR with large overhang primers to workStarted by Guest_EtOH_* , 10 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
Primer Efficiency across runsStarted by Guest_Joe101_* , 08 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
|
|
|




This topic is locked










