#1
Posted 01 October 2004 - 09:33 AM
Thank you in advance for the slightest hint.
#2
Posted 01 October 2004 - 12:42 PM
SVTX
#3
Posted 01 October 2004 - 01:10 PM
also pipette slowly rather than just aspirating all reagents quickly
i have had worse situation than u
#4
Posted 02 October 2004 - 05:24 AM
I have followed the following with good results...
1. Prepare your master mix in a separate room from your current location, somewhere PCR is not the main practice... Be sure to have a separate lab coat, gloves, tubes, pipette tips tobe used only in that clean room.
2. Use a separate aliquot of DEPC water stock for each round of PCR
3. Prepare your mix in a hood with laminar flow. Decontaminate it with bleach, alcohol, RNAse, DNase, etc... Be sure to UV-irradiate pipettes, pipette tips, tubes, racks, gloves, and also your aliquots of water and PCR buffer... before the procedure.
4. Use a different pipette tip when pipetting all your reagents, even the same master mix to each tube
5. Keep your tubes closed during the procedure, even your master mix tube. Be sure that your tubes are closed when discarding the pipette tip!!! Aerosols are dangerous!!! Open the tubes only when necessary.
6. More important... schedule your PCR when not handling plasmids!!!
Hope this help...
Good luck
This post has been promoted to an article
#5
Posted 04 October 2004 - 02:28 AM
if you make up your master mix first, change your gloves after you load your samples. if you load your samples before you master mix then change your gloves just before you make up your master mix.
hope it heaps
#6
Posted 14 October 2004 - 02:47 AM
when compared with ur positive control?? If it is faint in case of false positive and very bright in case of positive control then you can also try reducing the number of cycles.
good luck!!!
#7
Posted 15 October 2004 - 04:04 PM
Quote
Using fewer cycles won't get rid of contamination although it gives a false impression that there is no contamination.
#8
Posted 20 October 2004 - 11:26 PM
SVTX, on Oct 1 2004, 01:42 PM, said:
SVTX
#9
Posted 02 November 2004 - 01:41 AM
#10
Posted 08 May 2009 - 06:38 AM
I also have problems with qRT-PCR contamination in the NTC's.
I think I really tried everything: washed my pipets and UV radiated them, also tried pipets from someone else, changed my reagents (the water, the SYBR green Master Mix, ordered new primers and even new primers with another sequence in totally different exons). There is always contamination for my housekeeping gene but not for my gene of interest (There my NTC's are always nicely 40, so it would in my opinion not be a problem of the water, the Master Mix or the pipets I use)... The Ct-values for my housekeeping gene samples are between 16 and 23, but the Ct-values are very close to that (24-25) so that's to close to trust the Ct-values of my samples.
When I put the NTC's of my housekeeping gene on gel, they give the same band (also the same visibility) as my housekeeping gene in a sample with mRNA, so it's not a problem of primer-dimers.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance
Martine
#11
Posted 24 May 2009 - 11:52 PM
I also have problems with qRT-PCR contamination in the NTC's.
I think I really tried everything: washed my pipets and UV radiated them, also tried pipets from someone else, changed my reagents (the water, the SYBR green Master Mix, ordered new primers and even new primers with another sequence in totally different exons). There is always contamination for my housekeeping gene but not for my gene of interest (There my NTC's are always nicely 40, so it would in my opinion not be a problem of the water, the Master Mix or the pipets I use)... The Ct-values for my housekeeping gene samples are between 16 and 23, but the Ct-values are very close to that (24-25) so that's to close to trust the Ct-values of my samples.
When I put the NTC's of my housekeeping gene on gel, they give the same band (also the same visibility) as my housekeeping gene in a sample with mRNA, so it's not a problem of primer-dimers.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance
Martine
#12
Posted 26 May 2009 - 02:06 PM
#13
Posted 01 June 2009 - 03:23 AM
#14
Posted 11 June 2009 - 11:05 PM
Sonia, on Jun 1 2009, 08:23 PM, said:
strong false-positive intensity, but not a weak band, from aerosol contamination makes no sense (unless ur lab is dirty enough)
1. double-check all of ur reagents (water is the most one u should consider with)
2. take care with ur hand with which u open the tube ( it is possible that DNA remain on ur hand and brought into other tube which makes contamination)
3. take care with ur tip, never ever touch unexpected place
good luck
#15
Posted 15 June 2009 - 09:02 AM
Edited by lavoij, 15 June 2009 - 09:13 AM.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: pcr, contamination
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Tissue and Cell Culture →
Housekeeper for HEK cells?Started by Guest_Stephp_* , 17 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Molecular Cloning →
Cloning large fragmentsStarted by Guest_bknm_* , 15 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
Can't get PCR with large overhang primers to workStarted by Guest_EtOH_* , 10 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
Primer Efficiency across runsStarted by Guest_Joe101_* , 08 May 2013 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
PCR, RT-PCR and Real-Time PCR →
|
|
|




This topic is locked










