You find a rotating magnetic field in an mri and rotation in a magnetic field with an nmr. Why would yours be better to try than them?
A MRI scanner, ok - it has to be modifed, a mri scanner + an experimental adjustable system placed inside the mri scanner + output power controlling system. This means high costs overall and the inconvenent to be exposed at a radiation with a high input power during the tests (instead of taking the mountain near the house you can place a well-equipped caravans in several mountain locations ) - there is a lot of power in a MRI scanner , which in this particular case is not needed and not helping. I consider it a "magnetar" if we will involve it in the studies ( for tests and for laborants - direct and indirect long time expossure - there is a huge list of viruses and bacteria) .
Wikipedia : " While the hazards of ionizing radiation are now well controlled in most medical contexts, an MRI may still be seen as a better choice than a CT scan."......
At the first look :
A NMR - resolution directly depends on magnetic field strength, higher costs ( in comparation wiith aprox 60 euro or less , the proposed mobile RMF generator ) and a mobilty problem ...... and requires also adjusments software and" hardware" . Be aware of that we wish to stay in the " safety" area max 200 Hz - 2 GHz non ion-ionizing Radiation, 10 W input.power .... Considerations : direct/ indirect exposure of the laborants and tests . If you ask me, the input power it is always a factor we should take it in consideration when we are discussing about electromagnetic effects ( this time negative effects ) . A small input power means I am somehow " in the safety area " .
Analyzing the existing research with CONSIDERATIONS, https://publiclab.or...erator-x-device I realised that, some of the mentioned studies were done in the frequency range 1 - 50 hz, and were limited by the construction of rotating magnetic field generators, not at all simple as construction, and probably not cheap . I conclude that by their construction they had limitations in the tests, but with all the constructive limitations they obtained encouraging results.
Why the generator proposed by me ?
1.The proposed generator has a simple and efficient construction, it can be replicated free of charge by any laboratory that wants to test it against bacteria / viruses / organic tissue/etc for analyzing direct or indirect effects ( if they have problems with the replication, I am offering free asistance ) also it is : mobile, low cost ( 60 euro or less ) and due to the low input power max 10 W, keep the laborants in a safety area ( indirect exposure)
2. The advantage of using the RMF generator is that you can adjust the distance (z) between the sample x and the source (the spinning neo sphere 19.000 - 29.000 rpm in a specific position ), which is very important. - please , see the 3 rd picture in the mentioned link
3. I am proposing a research in range area 200 Hz - 2 Ghz.
Waiting for profesional considerations and observations regarding the mentioned STUDIES.
Edited by sciencetoolbar, 14 April 2020 - 06:04 AM.