Nice day to everybody.
0
3 replies to this topic
#1
Vincent Delespaux
-
- Active Members
-
- 6 posts
member
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 25 January 2002 - 11:43 PM
Nested PCR is reported to be 1000 times more sensitive than standard PCR (Mc Pherson 91). My gain in sensitivity is only ten fold. Is there something wrong in my protocol or is Mc Pherson optimistic?
#2
teerachild
-
- Active Members
-
- 14 posts
member
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 26 January 2002 - 10:15 AM
There are many factors affecting PRC experiments. Last week, I think it was easy to do PCR but my view has been changed coz my degenerated primers didn't work.
The writer's experiment was different to yours. Don't think that you'll get the same result as the writer.
The writer's experiment was different to yours. Don't think that you'll get the same result as the writer.
#3
moreyroger
-
- Members
-
- 4 posts
member
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 29 January 2002 - 07:44 AM
Longer is tougher too... Is noise a problem here, or are you just trying to increase yield?
#4
Vincent Delespaux
-
- Active Members
-
- 6 posts
member
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 30 January 2002 - 03:05 AM
I am just trying to increase yield!
Noise is not a problem.
Thanks for answer
Noise is not a problem.
Thanks for answer
