I am analysing WGBS data (Illumina Hiseq) of Bovine FAT tissues for differential methylation. I used TrimGalore for adaptor removal and qulity check for the the pilot sample . All the adoptors were removed and quality was good (both survived paired end reads 98%). Then I used Bismark for unique alignment to the Bisulfite converted reference genome and I got 57.8% mapping efficiency.
I want to ask wether 57.8% mapping efficiency is good to proceed further ? What is gold standard for mapping efficiency in WGBS? Please guide me.
Regards,
Naveed Jhamat.
Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Low mapping efficiency of WGBS data for DNA methylation
Started by Naveed Jhamat, Nov 15 2016 02:37 AM
Epigenetics WGBS DNA Methylation
No replies to this topic
#1
Naveed Jhamat
-
- Members
-
- 1 posts
member
0
Neutral
Neutral
Posted 15 November 2016 - 02:37 AM
Answered
