Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

3-primer PCR Genotyping - problem in hemizygotes

genotyping PCR knockout

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 ndivorty

ndivorty

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 06 February 2015 - 01:06 AM

Hi everyone,

 

I'm new here but desperate! I am using a 3-primer PCR to genotype knockout animals, with forward primers for the wild type and mutant alleles and a common reverse primer. This has worked well for a few litters but I have suddenly encountered a problem. The mutant band in my hemizygous animals has completely disappeared (I always run a known sample for both homo strains and a hemi.) I ran separate 2 primer reactions for each combination and found that the mutant primer pair amplifies efficiently in the homozygous knockouts, but poorly in the hemizygotes - I do see a faint band but not enough to confidently interpret in unknown samples. This band cannot be seen in the 3-primer reaction. The wild type primers work equally well in homozygous wild types and in hemis.

 

If anyone has encountered this before, I would love to know why it's happening. I'm at a complete loss!

 

I extract my DNA from ear notches using the Qiagen kit.

All 3 primers have T m of 66-67 degrees and my annealing temp is 60 degrees.

I use Qiagen HotStar Taq and its standard buffer.

I have ruled out reagent and freeze-thaw issues by using completely fresh reagents.

 

Thanks in advance :)

 



#2 phage434

phage434

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,553 posts
261
Excellent

Posted 06 February 2015 - 08:38 AM

Are the fragments significantly different in size? Short DNA fragments amplify much better than longer ones. You can always do the reactions separately, but if the combined reaction is necessary, you can try optimizing the annealing temperature with a known heterozygous sample.



#3 ndivorty

ndivorty

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 09 February 2015 - 02:42 PM

Thanks for the response. Yes, the WT fragment is 200 bp vs 600 for the KO. But the KO fragment amplifies very well in the homozygous KO animals, that's what I can't explain! Anyway, I dropped the annealing temp to 58 degrees and increased the MgCl2 concentration in the reaction. I got way more non-specific bands but I can now identify the genotypes successfully - hooray!







Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.