Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Does a restriction enzyme cut at a related site?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 astroboy89

astroboy89

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 29 July 2014 - 07:05 AM

I have a silly confusion.I wanted to know whether a restriction enzyme can recognize a incompatible site with compatible sticky endand cut it?

 

For e.g, SpeI and XbaI can generate compatible sticky ends but a slightly different recognition sites

 

For XbaI recognition site is TCTAGA and it cuts between T and C to generate T            CTAGA

                                           AGATCT                                                                 AGATC            T

 

For SpeI recognition site is ACTAGT and it cuts between A and C to generate A            CTAGT

                                           TGATCA                                                                 TGATC             A

 
So can SpeI cut XbaI sites and vice versa under any conditions?
 
So like the above example is this possible at all.If it happens I can have serious problems while cloning.
 
When SpeI and XbaI generate compatible sticky ends and they ligate,will the resulting mixed site be recognized and cut by either of the two enzymes?
 
Please can anyone clear this for me.unsure.png
 
 


#2 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,201 posts
110
Excellent

Posted 29 July 2014 - 12:17 PM

If you cut first one with XbaI and second with SpeI

 

Then the first one is originaly:

 

T-CTAGA

AGATC-T

And second is originaly:

 

A-CTAGT

TGATC-A

 

Then after cut and ligation you will have:

 

TCTAGT

AGATCA

 

which is neither XbaI or SpeI recognition sequence, and not even a palindrome. So none of these will be able to recut.

 

Depending on the surrounding sequence, you may be able to find enzyme that cuts this with the same overhang, using a NEB Enzyme Finder, one of the enzymes that have ambiguitious recognition sites. But they will not cut as specifically as XbaI or SpeI.


Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#3 Bio-Lad

Bio-Lad

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 85 posts
16
Good

Posted 29 July 2014 - 12:35 PM

As Trof stated, the mixed site should not be recognized.  The use of compatible overhangs to destroy sites at ligation is the foundation of some modular construct approaches such as BglBrick (which uses ligation of BglII and BamHI).  I've used this extensively and have never had cutting of the mixed sites.  What sort of cloning problem are you having?  Could you be a bit more specific?


Try pLOT, the a free plasmid mapping tool!

http://plasmidplotter.blogspot.com/


#4 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,201 posts
110
Excellent

Posted 29 July 2014 - 01:23 PM

I suppose that he actually needs the mixed site to be recut by XbaI or SpeI.


Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon


#5 astroboy89

astroboy89

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 29 July 2014 - 10:39 PM

Thank you for your replies.But nobody cleared the confusion as to whether SpeI and XbaI can recognize and cut each other's sites? Is it possible due to Star Activity?



#6 Trof

Trof

    Brain on a stick

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,201 posts
110
Excellent

Posted 29 July 2014 - 11:46 PM

Neither XbaI nor SpeI have a reported star activity in any of the NEB buffers, so it is unlikely.

In any case, star activity, if exhibited is unpredictible and low-efficient, though some conditions can increase it's possibility. But as I understood it, only in enzymes that are prone to it. 

 

If you need both vector and insert to be cut by same enzyme, you may use the PCR approach and PCR the smaller (insert) with a proofreeding polymerase and primers with overhang designed to contain the modified restriction site and few additional bp, then cut the PCR product and ligate. This approach was heavily discussed through the forums.


Our country has a serious deficiency in lighthouses. I assume the main reason is that we have no sea.

I never trust anything that can't be doubted.

'Normal' is a dryer setting. - Elizabeth Moon





Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.