Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

IRES vs 2A peptide for co-expression


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 sara.r

sara.r

    sara.r

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 84 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 27 May 2014 - 04:30 AM

Hi

I am going to express three genes in mammalian cells, one of them is a selection marker. I am doing this based on the opinion that if all genes are expressed under one promoter the chance of false possitive clones (due to the damage to GOI unit and integration of the selecetion marker unit only ) will reduce. and also I need to have proportional expression of the other two genes as well. So I was wondering if any one has expirences with IRES, 2A or both of them. my current design is based on IRES. any suggestion would be highly appreciated.

Kind Regards



#2 Rsm

Rsm

    Post Dog

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 376 posts
8
Neutral

Posted 30 May 2014 - 01:46 AM

There is actually a couple of papers comparing IRES and 2A. In my hands, P2A works way better than IRES sequences in terms of stoichiometry. Particularly if you want to express three genes, IRES will be very difficult. 


I got soul, but I'm not a soldier




Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.