SDS-PAGE running strangely
#1
Posted 17 June 2004 - 02:26 AM
cheers
#2
Posted 18 June 2004 - 05:29 AM
#3
Posted 18 June 2004 - 06:28 AM
#4
Posted 21 June 2004 - 04:59 AM
#5
Posted 21 June 2004 - 05:55 PM
#6
Posted 21 August 2004 - 12:14 AM
quol, on Jun 18 2004, 06:29 AM, said:
#7
Posted 02 September 2004 - 11:18 AM
Never really figured out the real cause but the solution was simple: to replace buffers used for sds-page..
Namely, the running buffer, sample loading buffer, buffer for resolving gel, and bufer for stacking gel. A common problem is pH: These buffers are concentrated tris solutions. Such solutions are known to give wrong pH when cheap pH electrodes are used. Therefore, ALWAYS check your pH with strips - or just don't use pH electrode in this case at all.
#8
Posted 30 September 2004 - 08:42 PM
flashboy, on Jun 17 2004, 03:26 AM, said:
cheers
atul
#9
Posted 24 February 2005 - 08:35 PM
Most important things, check the percentage of the gel the manufacturer used to produce the ladder. Generally 12% gel is used. I had mistakenly used 8% gel and some of the bands didn't separate out well.
Check for expiry of the marker. I once used an old Sigma marker and many of the bands were missing.
Is your marker a premixed soultion or separate powders which you reconstitue and pool. In the latter case, be sure that all the standards are mixed in equal molar concentration ; otherwise bands of unequal intensity ( probably missing) could result.
If you are employing silver staining then check out the manufacturer's instruction for the best staining procedure.
For best resolution you need to run the gel completely; that is, till the blue front reaches almost the bottom of the gel. Some of the bands separate out only after half the run has completed. You will notice this if you use prestained markers ( which are visible during the run itself).
Just an offhand suggestion: try running at a lower voltage ;say 80-100V
good luck
Edited by sharath, 24 February 2005 - 08:37 PM.
#10
Posted 09 March 2005 - 11:54 PM
Is that the protein surface charge that involve in the migration of protein on SDS PAGE?
Thank you in advance.
#11
Posted 10 March 2005 - 06:11 AM
ChiMy, on Mar 10 2005, 12:54 AM, said:
Is that the protein surface charge that involve in the migration of protein on SDS PAGE?
Thank you in advance.
On SDS PAGE, the protein migrate depending on its MW not the charge because the SDS mask the charge. try to boil the protien in sample buffer, when I say boiling means, boiling at 100C and for at least 5 or 10 mins.
good luck
#12
Posted 15 March 2005 - 04:04 AM
Some proteins also migrate unexpectedly like that, but there must be some reasons for this.
I think what I need is the characteristics of the proteins migrate strangely so that I can know more about the structure and characteristic of my protein...
Could you please suggest anything else?
#13
Posted 15 March 2005 - 08:01 AM
ok. is this protein postranscriptionally modified, i.e, phosphorylated, glycosylated, this could change its migration pattern.
whats the gel composition, is it 10% or 12% acrylamide. current you run the gel at, or volts, all those are factors that could add to the confusion.
if you say that this is published that it runs at 37kD then whats the reason they say in this paper.
#14
Posted 16 March 2005 - 10:47 PM
mabusheh, on Mar 15 2005, 09:01 AM, said:
ok. is this protein postranscriptionally modified, i.e, phosphorylated, glycosylated, this could change its migration pattern.
whats the gel composition, is it 10% or 12% acrylamide. current you run the gel at, or volts, all those are factors that could add to the confusion.
if you say that this is published that it runs at 37kD then whats the reason they say in this paper.
It is a mamalian protein, phosphorylated and myristoylated but I express it in Ecoli system, so it can not get post transcriptional modification.
The gel is 15%, 100 volts for 20 min and 200 volts for 40 mins.
The paper didnt suggest anything about this, just report like that.
Please help me figure the reason out...
#15
Posted 17 March 2005 - 06:27 AM
ChiMy, on Mar 16 2005, 11:47 PM, said:
mabusheh, on Mar 15 2005, 09:01 AM, said:
ok. is this protein postranscriptionally modified, i.e, phosphorylated, glycosylated, this could change its migration pattern.
whats the gel composition, is it 10% or 12% acrylamide. current you run the gel at, or volts, all those are factors that could add to the confusion.
if you say that this is published that it runs at 37kD then whats the reason they say in this paper.
It is a mamalian protein, phosphorylated and myristoylated but I express it in Ecoli system, so it can not get post transcriptional modification.
The gel is 15%, 100 volts for 20 min and 200 volts for 40 mins.
The paper didnt suggest anything about this, just report like that.
Please help me figure the reason out...
try 10% or 12% acrylamide gels, and try to run at 80 volts for 30 min, then at 50 or 60 volts for whatever time it takes for the tracking dye to run to the bottom of your gel.
I think expressing the mammalian protein in E.Coli changes the protien somehow, isn't that right? I think the protein synthesis machinary in bacteria adds up formyl methionine to the N terminus of the protein rather than methionine? I am not sure if there are other factors that could contribute to this. have you ever tried extracting this protein from mammalian tissue and run it on the gel and compare the differences.




This topic is locked









