Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
- - - - -

Km calculation

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 claire84



  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 34 posts

Posted 31 March 2014 - 01:17 AM

Hello everyone!!

I'm trying to measure the km of MMP2 in the presence of a peptide substrate. I measured the increase of fluorescence at various concentrations of substrate but I encontered some problems with high substrate concentrations. High substrate concentrations cause the saturation of the instrument signal and the increase of fluorescence is no more visible. Lowering the sensibility of the instrument signal could help to solve the problem for high concentrations, but it could be  problem for the lower ones.

Do you know how to skip this problem?


Thanks for any help!!


#2 mdfenko


    an elder emeritus

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,355 posts

Posted 31 March 2014 - 03:51 AM

if all you want to determine is km then you need to determine vmax. you can sacrifice the lowest concentrations because you shouldn't need them for km determination.

talent does what it can
genius does what it must
i used to do what i got paid to do

#3 DRT



  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 176 posts

Posted 31 March 2014 - 11:03 AM

Look at using one of the ‘integrated-MM’ techniques. I have an Excel version of the Schnell & Mendoza equation but there are others dating back to the 70’s. They follow the progress of the entire curve at any given substrate concentration to estimate the Km and Vmax.  I am still not convinced they give as good an answer as the traditional method of varying substrate concentration but in your situation you may not have a choice.

Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.