Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Agarose bead size in affinity chromatography

Agarose bead size affinity chromatography

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 map3k

map3k

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 14 October 2013 - 01:17 AM

Hello everybody,

 

I have a quick question regarding agarose bead size in affinity chromatography, specifically nickel-coated beads for purification of his-tagged proteins. I'm using small columns (1 ml) on an FPLC. If I have a selection of the same column size with the same binding affinity, only differing in bead size (i.e. 34 µm or 165 µm), what is the advantage of smaller beads? I know that larger beads give me a higher possible flow-rate (less back-pressure) which is generally a good thing, as it saves time. OK. But the smaller beads? Binding capacity is the same (as stated by the manufacturer), resolution should not matter either, right? As this isn't a "dumb" elution by time (as in size exclusion chromatography) but an elution with Imidazole in which I can determine the exact amount to add to specifically elute my protein of interest empirically, so the resolution should be the same no matter the bead size.

 

So, anyone using columns with small beads on purpose - if so, why?

 

Thanks!

map3k



#2 Missle

Missle

    Veteran

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 132 posts
18
Good

Posted 15 October 2013 - 04:09 AM

I use GE's HisTrap resins and they offer a HP version (bead size 34um) and a FF version (bead size 90um).  I use the FF as it suits my needs fine but the smaller bead size of HP does provide slightly better capacity and resolution.  Resolution can still be obtained even though it's not a 'dumb' elution.  Using an automatic purifier, like an AKTA, a gradient elution can be done to help resolve the protein of interest from contaminating host cell proteins that bind with slightly different affinities so the smaller bead size does hold some value if you've got the tools to make use of it and need the better resolution.....



#3 map3k

map3k

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 20 October 2013 - 02:02 AM

Thanks! Yes, that does seem logical. I'm pretty much in the same situation as you i.e. the FF suits my needs in 90% of all cases but I might just have a go at the HP for some of the more stubborn samples where I still have problems with purity. Will try a really shallow gradient and check if I see significant differences...







Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.