Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

Quantifying bisulfite-converted DNA (pre- and post-pcr) and direct sequencing

bisulfite conversion direct sequencing DNA methylation Beckman Coulter GeXP

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 MegaKeenObserver

MegaKeenObserver

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 24 August 2013 - 06:35 AM

1. I am new to studies on DNA methylation, and I understand that when using BS-converted DNA for any downstream application, it is crucial to correctly quantify the mostly degraded DNA. It appears that pre-pcr, i get fairly reliable nanodrop readings when I quantify BS-converted DNA using factor 40 similar to RNA (got this suggestion off the Zymokit manual). After PCR, the results dont seem to be as reliable. Can I really measure BS-converted DNA post-pcr and after clean up, using nanodrop?

2. I have come across articles with gel pictures indicating complete conversion of DNA following BS-treatment with only a smear in each lane. What I dont understand is, shouldnt one be looking for the right-sized bands after running amplified BS-converted DNA? Or does it mean complete conversion indicated by a smear on a gel is checked for using the BS-converted DNA before pcr?

3. I have tried direct sequencing of my amplified BS-converted DNA on Beckman Coulter GeXP but i keep getting abrupt signal dropouts. this could be due to the GC-rich nature of the CpG island I am trying to sequence as I have been informed. So i tried using 5% DMSO in the PCR reaction. I am still optimizing the direct sequencing but what interests me is that despite reports that DMSO doesnt interfere with DNA amplification, i consistently get fainter bands on gel electrophoresis suggesting less amplification of the DNA. Anyone has experience using DMSO in a pcr? Also, is direct sequencing of such products (without cloning) a good idea?

Any suggestions? 



#2 et2b

et2b

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 47 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 25 August 2013 - 11:12 PM

1. Post PCR it should be double stranded again. So yes indeed. Be aware that you do not have to convert to RNA since the "U" have been converted by the polymerase to regular DNA base again.

2. I havent read any such articles, a smear is never a good indication of bisulfite conversion. We and all other DNA meth. labs I know use Sanger Sequencing of converted DNA to get an idea of conversion.

   When testing BS-PCR primers:  always incorporate a few reactions on gDNA, these should be blanco (otherwise your DNA meth quantification is dependent on your bisulfite conversion --> unreliable).

    Your product should also be unique. Its PCR... a-specific bands are a big no-no.  No unique bands? Redo PCR optimalization and if that does not work redesign primers.

 

3. Please also be aware that most software used to watch your traces inflate the C background signal; depending how the software works this might also influence the other 3 bases calibration and signal intensities.

    I always look at the raw signal from the ABI.  It might help to add a bit more T to your dNTP mix. It might run out rapidly depending on the amount of starting material in your sanger reaction.

    About DMSO, no idea, sorry. 

 

Hope this helps,

best



#3 MegaKeenObserver

MegaKeenObserver

    member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 26 August 2013 - 01:32 AM

Hi et2b, 

 

Thanks for the info. That was really helpful.







Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.