Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

GAPDH Ct value


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 harry348

harry348

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 71 posts
3
Neutral

Posted 06 August 2013 - 07:00 AM

hello all

 

Recently i did qpcr and in this i found the CT value of GAPDH reaching 26.Its the first time i got a value like this. Most of the time i get at 18 or 19 Ct but now its around 26.

Ct value of the sample is at 28.

 

Do you think that there is some thing wrong?Could anyone please tell me why it is like this. If so does it affect while doing ablsoute quantification.

 

find the attached picture

 

thanks in advance

 

Hari

Attached Thumbnails

  • amplification curve (gapdh and sample).png


#2 Tabaluga

Tabaluga

    Making glass out of shards

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 398 posts
49
Excellent

Posted 07 August 2013 - 06:42 AM

Can you upload the amplification plot with a linear y-axis instead of log ?

How did your other samples look like ? Can you compare with previous runs (has the Ct value of the sample become higher too, or is this just the case with GAPDH ?). Is it the same cDNA as previously ? If you have used the same cDNA as in previous runs and only GAPDH suddenly has a higher Ct, it does look like something is wrong.

 

Also, is GAPDH a suitable/established housekeeping gene for the cells the cDNA comes from ? Have you tried any others ?


Edited by Tabaluga, 07 August 2013 - 06:45 AM.

Il dort. Quoique le sort fût pour lui bien étrange,
Il vivait. Il mourut quand il n'eut plus son ange;
La chose simplement d'elle-même arriva,
Comme la nuit se fait lorsque le jour s'en va.

 


#3 Podge

Podge

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 44 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 07 August 2013 - 07:53 AM

Those curves look a bit funky.



#4 traveler9907

traveler9907

    member

  • Watched members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 29 August 2013 - 07:39 PM

It looks like you have a minor instrument issue too with that spike. If the cDNA is not normalized, then it doesn't matter if Gapdh is the same Ct value AS LONG AS you validated it prior using the same RNA input. Other options include using a reference gene panel to find a suitable reference gene. There is a good panel here. www.bio-rad.com/primepcr

#5 Anpu

Anpu

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 13 posts
0
Neutral

Posted 06 September 2013 - 12:19 AM

As members before me mentioned that this graph are a little funky. There is starting to show a double waterfall effect so maybe the baseline is faulty (you need to correct it). And of course is GAPDH the best reference gene for your samples.

 

The second thing is that i once got double belly like graphs (on housekeeping gene) and the reason was that my temperatures of the run were wrong for 1,5°C.

 

regards






Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.