Jump to content

  • Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log in with Windows Live Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!
Photo
- - - - -

How do you think about PeerJ?

journal PeerJ

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 Cacaucenturion2

Cacaucenturion2

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 04 August 2013 - 05:45 PM

As a new open access journal, PeerJ has been starting to accept papers for about half a year. I think its novelty is the strategy of paying money for publishing. How do you think of this journal? Besides, since its IF cannot be released now, how high do you think of the IF of PeerJ could be?



#2 pito

pito

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,337 posts
82
Excellent

Posted 04 August 2013 - 10:31 PM

It seems a nice initiative!

 

And looking at the reviewers... there are some "big" names so its not some obscure new journal.

 

I also see some familiar names in the "Governing Board".

 

I am a fan of open source papers.. so I like it.


If you don't know it, then ask it! Better to ask and look foolish to some than not ask and stay stupid.


#3 Tabaluga

Tabaluga

    Making glass out of shards

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 403 posts
49
Excellent

Posted 05 August 2013 - 03:41 AM

I think one of the novelties is also that it charges a membership fee for authors that allows them to publish once a year or something like that, if I'm correct....


Il dort. Quoique le sort fût pour lui bien étrange,
Il vivait. Il mourut quand il n'eut plus son ange;
La chose simplement d'elle-même arriva,
Comme la nuit se fait lorsque le jour s'en va.

 


#4 pito

pito

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,337 posts
82
Excellent

Posted 05 August 2013 - 03:45 AM

I think one of the novelties is also that it charges a membership fee for authors that allows them to publish once a year or something like that, if I'm correct....

no you need to (or are asked to) to a review once a year (check a paper)


If you don't know it, then ask it! Better to ask and look foolish to some than not ask and stay stupid.


#5 Tabaluga

Tabaluga

    Making glass out of shards

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 403 posts
49
Excellent

Posted 05 August 2013 - 05:10 AM

Ah yes, I mixed it up with the fact that they are allowed to publish in certain intervals for a lifetime then...


Il dort. Quoique le sort fût pour lui bien étrange,
Il vivait. Il mourut quand il n'eut plus son ange;
La chose simplement d'elle-même arriva,
Comme la nuit se fait lorsque le jour s'en va.

 


#6 doxorubicin

doxorubicin

    Veteran

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 192 posts
15
Good

Posted 05 August 2013 - 05:24 AM

I also like the idea of open source. It seems traditional journals can be replaced by technology (like stock brokers and real estate agents). Aren't the "big" names the ones who created all the trouble (cronyism, unscrupulous review practices, etc.) with traditional journals?



#7 pito

pito

    Veteran

  • Global Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,337 posts
82
Excellent

Posted 05 August 2013 - 06:38 AM

I also like the idea of open source. It seems traditional journals can be replaced by technology (like stock brokers and real estate agents). Aren't the "big" names the ones who created all the trouble (cronyism, unscrupulous review practices, etc.) with traditional journals?

No, I ment names that ring a bell.. scientists that have a reputation...


If you don't know it, then ask it! Better to ask and look foolish to some than not ask and stay stupid.


#8 newborn

newborn

    Enthusiast

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 72 posts
2
Neutral

Posted 07 August 2013 - 05:24 AM

I am also a fan of open source Journal, it is more flexible. No limitation of number of pages!



#9 Allies2000

Allies2000

    member

  • Active Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
1
Neutral

Posted 14 August 2013 - 01:46 AM

I like open source Journals. All of us probably have at least ones problem with read some (mostly older) paper because it is in limited access journal issue. Open access journals are free to read but not for publish. But in most cases when You have funding for whole project You have money for publication in it. So the change for author is small, but this system provide big positive change for readers.

 

I agree with pito - names, names, names. New journal don't have impact factor so it must have big support in names of editors or/and strong family of journals (eg. ESA).

 

I don't agree with newborn about size. I think that size remind You about staing focus as much as possible. If You cannot present Your work short and clear it is very likely that there is some general problem with Your experiment (or Your understanding of its results). It may be better to rethink of it at all rather than trying to sqeeze it to any journal issue (and waste readers time on it ;)). Making paper simple and short is best citation booster for it.






Home - About - Terms of Service - Privacy - Contact Us

©1999-2013 Protocol Online, All rights reserved.