I'm a PhD student and have been using Wst and MTT assay for a couple of years now. I am working with pectins - some are purified, while others are pretty crude.
Take one of the purified pectins for example: I have carried out many Wst and MTT assays. I'd say that ~80% of the time the pectin reduces cell proliferation ~(according to the assays). Because this doesn't happen 100% of the time I'm confused! And the amount it reduces proliferation by varies also - it can be between 10-60% reduction.
This happens with the other pectins too - although the times they reduce cell proliferation could be 50/50%.
I use FTS (cancer drug) as a control and get similar results every time.
I could say that the cruder pectins may not be homogenous and so act on the cells differently every time. Could I say this about the purified pectin too?
Its driving me crazy! I so want to move on, but every time I do an assay and the pectin does not reduce cell proliferation, I feel I have to do it again, and again... and again.
I realise most scientists would just do the assay 3 times and move on... But I can't seem to.
Anyone with experience working with polysaccharides and cell proliferation assays?
Or any info or ideas are appreciated!
Submit your paper to J Biol Methods today!

MTT assay with polysaccharides - different results every time. Help!
Started by Elioelio, Jul 16 2013 11:49 AM
MTT assay Wst assay
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 16 July 2013 - 11:49 AM
#2
Posted 16 July 2013 - 01:12 PM
Are you being particular about the condition of the media as you add the pectin? I can imagine that small changes in the pH make a large difference to the solubility/gelling/interacting properties of pectins.
Also, have you tried generating a full inhibition curve ie reporting the IC50 ±SD rather than trying to hit a single concentration? If the inhibition curve is steep then small variations in IC50 will cause a large difference in the %inhibition at a single concentration.
Also, have you tried generating a full inhibition curve ie reporting the IC50 ±SD rather than trying to hit a single concentration? If the inhibition curve is steep then small variations in IC50 will cause a large difference in the %inhibition at a single concentration.
#3
Posted 17 July 2013 - 01:25 AM
I've done 3 concentrations. Almost always it is dose dependent. I've not worked out the IC50, but thanks, thats not something I've thought about before.
With regards to the media - I add all the pectins to the same media. Some react differently - the low de-esterified pectins become more gel like as they react with the calcium. But the rest - there seems to be no difference. All the pH's of the pectins are different, but all go to pH8 in the media.
With regards to the media - I add all the pectins to the same media. Some react differently - the low de-esterified pectins become more gel like as they react with the calcium. But the rest - there seems to be no difference. All the pH's of the pectins are different, but all go to pH8 in the media.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: MTT assay, Wst assay
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Tissue and Cell Culture →
cell viability assay for caco-2 and pbmcStarted by prollic, 06 Jun 2016 ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Tissue and Cell Culture →
SHSH5Y cellsStarted by Prake, 25 Jul 2015 ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Cell Biology →
MTT, Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assay →
Different drug treating timeStarted by cell 293, 04 Feb 2015 ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Cell Biology →
MTT, Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assay →
MTT assay without positive controlStarted by elise, 08 Mar 2014 ![]() |
|
![]() |
||
Protocols and Techniques Forums →
Pharmacology and Pharmaceutics →
IC50 calculation: Should you calculate IC50 for each replicate experiment and thStarted by swuxi77, 21 Aug 2013 ![]() |
|
![]() |